Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Knife Attack Case. Appellant's conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC confirmed as evidence of common intention and multiple stab wounds established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Nitin Vishnu Sadamat, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Sandeep and for attempting to murder Ajay Gaikwad, Pramod, and the complainant. The incident occurred on 5th June 1999 at about 9:30 p.m. near Takre Samaj Temple, Ganeshnagar, Bopadi. The prosecution case was that the appellant, along with his brother (acquitted), attacked the victims following an altercation at a carrom house. The appellant inflicted a knife blow on Ajay Gaikwad, then stabbed the complainant in the stomach, stabbed Pramod in the chest, and finally inflicted stab wounds on Sandeep's chest, causing his death. The appellant and his brother fled. The trial court convicted the appellant and acquitted the brother. The appellant appealed against his conviction. The High Court examined the evidence of eyewitnesses, including injured witnesses PW5 (Pramod) and PW6 (Ajay Gaikwad), and the complainant PW10. The court found their testimony consistent and credible, corroborated by medical evidence. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and that the conviction was justified. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on direct testimony of eyewitnesses and medical evidence - Appellant inflicted multiple stab wounds on the deceased and injured others - Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-10).

B) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Injuries caused to complainant and other witnesses - Appellant stabbed the complainant in the stomach and another witness in the chest - Held that the intention to cause death was evident from the nature of injuries (Paras 2-8).

C) Evidence Law - Credibility of Witnesses - Testimony of injured witnesses and relatives - Minor contradictions do not discredit the prosecution case - Held that the evidence of eyewitnesses was consistent and reliable (Paras 5-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 307 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Attempt to murder
  • Common intention
  • Multiple stab wounds
  • Dying declaration
  • Medical evidence
  • Credibility of witnesses
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 72

Criminal Appeal No.373 of 2001

2005-04-19

V.G. Palshikar, Smt. Nishita Mhatre

Mr. B.G. Vaidya for Appellant, Smt. V.R. Bhonsale for Respondent

Nitin Vishnu Sadamat

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 307 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court for murder and attempt to murder.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 302 and 307 IPC; co-accused acquitted.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder is sustainable. Whether the conviction under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence of eyewitnesses was unreliable and contradictory. Respondent argued that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through consistent testimony and medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of injured eyewitnesses, corroborated by medical evidence, establishes the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. Minor contradictions do not discredit the prosecution case.

Judgment Excerpts

The conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code has been impugned in this Appeal. The prosecution case is based on an incident which occurred on 5th June 1999 at about 9.30 p.m.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 302 and 307 IPC; co-accused acquitted. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.373 of 2001 before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Knife Attack Case. Appellant's conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC confirmed as evidence of common intention and multiple stab wounds established guilt beyond reasonable d...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Matrimonial and Custody Proceedings from Bijapur to Bengaluru on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Preponderance of Proceedings at Bengaluru. The court held that under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the ...