Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Insult. Court held that absence of specific allegation of caste-based humiliation in public view makes Section 18 bar inapplicable, granting relief under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 131
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, seven individuals, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the rejection of their pre-arrest bail application by the trial court. The appeal arose from Crime No. 188 of 2019 registered at Hadgaon Police Station, Nanded, for offences under Sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The complainant, Latabai Dattrao Gajbhare, alleged that on 10-10-2019, the appellants abused her and assaulted her. However, the court noted that the FIR did not contain any specific allegation that the appellants insulted or intimidated the complainant with the intent to humiliate her on the ground of her caste, nor that the alleged incident occurred in a place within public view. The court observed that the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, which prohibits anticipatory bail, applies only when a prima facie case under the Act is made out. Since the allegations did not prima facie disclose the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 3(1)(r)(s), the court held that the appellants were entitled to pre-arrest bail. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and directed that the appellants be released on bail on executing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 each with one or two sureties.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Pre-arrest Bail - Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Anticipatory Bail - Appellants sought pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 188/2019 for offences under Sections 143, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act - Court held that where the FIR does not contain specific allegations that the accused insulted or intimidated the complainant with intent to humiliate on the ground of caste in a place within public view, the bar under Section 18 of the Act is not attracted and pre-arrest bail can be granted - Held that the appellants made out a case for bail (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants are entitled to pre-arrest bail under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, when the allegations do not prima facie disclose an intention to humiliate on the ground of caste in public view.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The impugned order rejecting pre-arrest bail is set aside. The appellants are directed to be released on bail on executing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 each with one or two sureties.

Law Points

  • Pre-arrest bail
  • SC/ST Act
  • prima facie case
  • caste-based insult
  • public view
  • Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act
  • 1989
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (12) 4

Criminal Appeal No. 1134 of 2019

2019-12-13

K.K. Sonawane

Mr. Pratap P. Mandlik for Appellants, Mr. A. P. Basarkar, APP for respondent No. 1-State

Janardhan s/o Rambhau Tawde, Vikas s/o Janardhan Tawde, Kailas s/o Janardhan Tawde, Dharrav s/o Sambharao Magar, Dnyaneshwar s/o Babanrao Tawde, Gajanan s/o Shamrao Magar, Sharad s/o Dadarao Tawde

The State of Maharashtra, Lata w/o Dattrao Gajbhare

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against rejection of pre-arrest bail under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 188/2019 registered at Hadgaon Police Station.

Filing Reason

Appellants were accused of offences under Sections 143, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989, and their pre-arrest bail application was rejected by the trial court.

Previous Decisions

The trial court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of the appellants.

Issues

Whether the allegations in the FIR prima facie constitute an offence under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act, 1989, so as to attract the bar under Section 18 of the Act. Whether the appellants are entitled to pre-arrest bail under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act, 1989.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the FIR does not contain any specific allegation that they insulted or intimidated the complainant with intent to humiliate on the ground of caste in a place within public view. State opposed the bail, but the court found no prima facie case under the SC/ST Act.

Ratio Decidendi

For the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act to apply, there must be a prima facie case that the accused insulted or intimidated the complainant with intent to humiliate on the ground of caste in a place within public view. In the absence of such specific allegations, pre-arrest bail can be granted under Section 14-A(2) of the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The FIR does not contain any specific allegation that the appellants insulted or intimidated the complainant with intent to humiliate on the ground of caste in a place within public view. In the absence of such specific allegations, the bar under Section 18 of the Act is not attracted.

Procedural History

The appellants were accused in Crime No. 188/2019. Their pre-arrest bail application was rejected by the trial court. They then filed the present appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act, 1989, which was heard and decided on 13-12-2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 323, 504
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(r)(s), 14-A(2), 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Insult. Court held that absence of specific allegation of caste-based humiliation in public view makes Section 18 bar inapplicable, granting ...