Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Leave and Licence Dispute — Directs Payment of Licence Fees at Contractual Rate with 7.5% Annual Escalation. The court modified the trial court's order under Order XV-A CPC to include escalation and maintenance charges as per separate agreements.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 42
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners (defendants in the suit) challenged an order dated 01/01/2019 passed by the Small Causes Court, Nagpur, which partly allowed their application under Order XV-A CPC and directed the respondent (plaintiff) to pay Rs.10,000/- per month as licence fees. The dispute arose from a Leave and Licence agreement dated 01/10/2011, under which the respondent occupied the petitioners' property. The agreement stipulated a monthly licence fee of Rs.10,000/- with a 7.5% annual increase after every eleven months. Additionally, a separate maintenance agreement dated 10/10/2011 required the respondent to pay Rs.25,000/- per month for amenities. The respondent filed a suit alleging that its servants were being prevented from enjoying the property due to non-payment of licence fees and maintenance charges. The petitioners filed a written statement and counter-claim for possession and arrears. During the suit, the petitioners moved an application under Order XV-A CPC seeking direction to the respondent to deposit arrears of licence fees and maintenance charges, claiming a total of Rs.40,446/- per month. The trial court partly allowed the application, directing payment of only Rs.10,000/- per month as licence fees, without considering the escalation clause or the maintenance agreement. The High Court held that the trial court erred in ignoring the escalation clause and the separate maintenance agreement. It modified the order, directing the respondent to pay licence fees at Rs.10,000/- per month with a 7.5% annual increase from 01/10/2011, and maintenance charges at Rs.25,000/- per month from 10/10/2011. The court also directed the respondent to pay arrears within four weeks and continue paying current amounts. The writ petition was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Order XV-A CPC - Interim Deposit of Licence Fees - The court considered an application under Order XV-A CPC for direction to deposit arrears of licence fees and maintenance charges - Held that the trial court ought to have considered the escalation clause in the agreement and the separate maintenance agreement while determining the amount payable - The order was modified to direct payment of licence fees at Rs.10,000/- per month with 7.5% annual increase from 01/10/2011, and maintenance charges at Rs.25,000/- per month from 10/10/2011 (Paras 1-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court erred in fixing the licence fees at Rs.10,000/- per month without considering the escalation clause and maintenance charges under Order XV-A CPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is partly allowed. The impugned order is modified to direct the respondent to pay licence fees at Rs.10,000/- per month with 7.5% annual increase from 01/10/2011, and maintenance charges at Rs.25,000/- per month from 10/10/2011. Arrears to be paid within four weeks, and current amounts to be paid regularly. Rule made absolute in those terms.

Law Points

  • Order XV-A CPC
  • Leave and Licence Agreement
  • Licence Fees
  • Maintenance Charges
  • Escalation Clause
  • Interim Application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (11) 123

Writ Petition No.3553 of 2019

2019-11-08

A. S. Chandurkar, J.

Shri R. M. Sharma for petitioners, Shri Lakshya Khullar with Shri Avinash Kalariya for respondent

Daksha w/o Jyotindra Patel, Nagpur Transwell Power Pvt. Ltd., Jyotindra Goverdhanbhai Patel

Big V. Telecom Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging an interim order under Order XV-A CPC in a suit for declaration and injunction relating to leave and licence agreement.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought modification of the trial court's order to direct the respondent to pay arrears of licence fees with escalation and maintenance charges.

Filing Reason

The trial court partly allowed the application under Order XV-A CPC directing payment of only Rs.10,000/- per month as licence fees, ignoring the escalation clause and maintenance agreement.

Previous Decisions

The Small Causes Court, Nagpur, passed an order dated 01/01/2019 partly allowing the application and directing payment of Rs.10,000/- per month as licence fees.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in not considering the escalation clause in the Leave and Licence agreement while fixing the licence fees under Order XV-A CPC. Whether the trial court ought to have considered the separate maintenance agreement for determining the amount payable under Order XV-A CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the trial court ignored the escalation clause providing for 7.5% annual increase and the separate maintenance agreement requiring payment of Rs.25,000/- per month. Respondent contended that the licence fees were being deposited regularly and the maintenance charges were not part of the licence agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Order XV-A CPC, the court must consider the contractual terms including escalation clauses and separate agreements for maintenance while determining the interim amount payable by a licensee.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Judge of the Small Causes Court partly allowed the application and directed the respondent to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month as licence fees. The trial court ought to have considered the escalation clause in the agreement and the separate maintenance agreement while determining the amount payable.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a suit for declaration and injunction in the Small Causes Court, Nagpur. The petitioners filed a written statement and counter-claim. During pendency, the petitioners moved an application under Order XV-A CPC for direction to deposit arrears. The trial court partly allowed the application on 01/01/2019. The petitioners challenged this order by way of writ petition in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XV-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Corrigendum to Final Development Plan. Corrigendum Restoring Botanical Garden Reservation Upheld as Permissible Rectification of Error Without Fresh Notification Under MRTP Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Leave and Licence Dispute — Directs Payment of Licence Fees at Contractual Rate with 7.5% Annual Escalation. The court modified the trial court's order under Order XV-A CPC to include escalation and ...