Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition After Settlement Between Parties in Cheque Dishonour Case. Court sets aside conviction and orders of trial court and revisional court after complainant files affidavit of no grievance and parties enter into consent terms.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Lalita Kamal Vyas, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri, Mumbai in C.C. No. 4158/SS/2017, and an order dated 19th January 2019 passed by the Sessions Court, Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No. 1100 of 2018. The petitioner sought to set aside these orders. During the proceedings, the parties informed the court that they had resolved their dispute. The petitioner's counsel tendered a memorandum of understanding/consent terms dated 1st October 2019, which was taken on record. The respondent No. 2, Gordhan J. Sonani, filed an affidavit stating that he had no grievance against the petitioner. Both counsel jointly prayed that the petition be allowed and disposed of in light of the settlement. Respondent No. 2 was personally present in court and confirmed the settlement. The court, taking into consideration the affidavit and the consent terms, allowed the petition and set aside the impugned orders. The court did not elaborate on the underlying facts of the case, as the matter was disposed of based on the settlement.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Cheque Dishonour - Settlement and Compounding - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 - The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties subsequently settled the dispute and the complainant filed an affidavit stating no grievance. The High Court, considering the settlement and consent terms, set aside the conviction and the revisional order, allowing the writ petition. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned orders of conviction and revision should be set aside in light of the settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri, Mumbai in C.C. No. 4158/SS/2017 and the order dated 19th January 2019 passed by the Sessions Court, Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No. 1100 of 2018.

Law Points

  • Settlement between parties in cheque dishonour case
  • compounding of offence
  • quashing of conviction on settlement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (10) 90

Criminal Writ Petition No. 840 of 2019

2019-10-04

S.S. Shinde

Mr. Kapil P. Dave for Petitioner, Mr. Rajender Singh Saluja for Respondent No. 2, Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for Respondent – State

Lalita Kamal Vyas

The State of Maharashtra, Gordhan J. Sonani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and revisional order.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate and the order dated 19th January 2019 passed by the Sessions Court.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and the revision was dismissed.

Previous Decisions

The Metropolitan Magistrate convicted the petitioner in C.C. No. 4158/SS/2017 on 6th September 2017. The Sessions Court dismissed the revision on 19th January 2019.

Issues

Whether the impugned orders should be set aside in light of the settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 jointly submitted that the dispute is resolved and Respondent No. 2 has no grievance. They prayed for allowing the petition based on the consent terms and affidavit.

Ratio Decidendi

When parties settle the dispute in a cheque dishonour case and the complainant files an affidavit stating no grievance, the court may set aside the conviction and revisional order to give effect to the settlement.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel appearing for Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 submit that, the entire dispute is resolved, and the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 have arrived at a settlement and Respondent No. 2 has no grievance against the Petitioner. Respondent No. 2 is personally present in the Court.

Procedural History

The petitioner was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 6th September 2017. The petitioner filed a criminal revision which was dismissed by the Sessions Court on 19th January 2019. The petitioner then filed the present Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition After Settlement Between Parties in Cheque Dishonour Case. Court sets aside conviction and orders of trial court and revisional court after complainant files affidavit of no grievance and parties enter ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Inconsistent dying declarations and lack of corroboration led to upholding of acquittal for murder under Section 302 IPC.