High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order of University Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Consultation Requirements. Transfer of In-Charge Comptroller Set Aside as Order Was Passed Without Consulting the University as Required Under Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Shivaputra M Honnalli, was serving as In-Charge Comptroller at the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. The State Government, by order dated 06.09.2025, transferred him to the Public Works Department, Dharwad, purportedly under the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010. The petitioner challenged this transfer by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the transfer order. The main legal issue was whether the transfer order was valid given that the University was not consulted before passing it. The petitioner argued that Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010 requires the State Government to consult the University before transferring its employees. The respondents, including the State Government and the University, contended that the transfer was in the public interest and that the petitioner was a government servant. The court analyzed the provisions of the Act and found that the petitioner was an employee of the University, a statutory body, and that Section 14(4) mandates consultation with the University before any transfer. Since no such consultation took place, the transfer order was held to be invalid. The court quashed the impugned order and allowed the writ petition, emphasizing that statutory requirements must be strictly complied with.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Statutory Consultation - Section 14(4) of Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010 - Transfer of an employee of a statutory university by the State Government without consulting the university is invalid - The petitioner, an In-Charge Comptroller of the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, was transferred by the State Government to the Public Works Department without any consultation with the University - Held that the transfer order is quashed as it violates the mandatory requirement of consultation under Section 14(4) of the Act (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer order dated 06.09.2025 passed by the State Government transferring the petitioner from the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to the Public Works Department is valid when the University was not consulted as required under Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 06.09.2025 passed by Respondent No.1 is quashed.

Law Points

  • Transfer order quashed for non-compliance with statutory consultation requirement
  • Section 14(4) of Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act
  • 2010
  • Writ of Certiorari
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (10) 31

WP No. 106663 of 2025 (S-RES)

2025-10-08

Suraj Govindaraj

Sri Prashant S Kadadevar (for petitioner), Sri Sharad V Magadum (AGA for R1), Sri Mrutyunjaya S Hallikeri (for R2 & R3), Sri Satish M Doddamani (Senior Counsel for Smt Vidyavathi M Kotturshettar, Advocate for R4)

Sri Shivaputra M Honnalli

The State of Karnataka, The Vice Chancellor, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, The Registrar, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Pooja Doddamani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a transfer order passed by the State Government transferring the petitioner from the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to the Public Works Department.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned transfer order dated 06.09.2025 passed by Respondent No.1.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was transferred without consulting the University as required under Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010.

Issues

Whether the transfer order dated 06.09.2025 is valid when the University was not consulted as required under Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the transfer order was passed without consulting the University, violating Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010. Respondents contended that the transfer was in public interest and the petitioner was a government servant subject to transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

A transfer order of an employee of a statutory university passed by the State Government without consulting the university as mandated by Section 14(4) of the Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010 is invalid and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: Issue an order, direction, writ or any appropriate order, writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 06.09.2025 vide No.AA E 189 RAA LE PA 2025 (1) passed by the respondent No.1 (Annexure-D). The transfer order is quashed as it violates the mandatory requirement of consultation under Section 14(4) of the Act.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India on an unspecified date. The petition was heard and reserved on 24.09.2025, and the order was pronounced on 08.10.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Agricultural Universities Act, 2010: Section 14(4)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order of University Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Consultation Requirements. Transfer of In-Charge Comptroller Set Aside as Order Was Passed Without Consulting the University as Required Under ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admissions Upheld. Court held that admissions must be clear and unequivocal for judgment under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, and disputed que...