Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that contributory negligence of deceased motorcyclist must be considered when calculating compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondents (original claimants) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar. The claimants, Murlidhar Kabra and Kantabai Kabra, sought compensation for the death of their son, who died in a motor vehicle accident involving a truck insured by the appellant, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 15,50,000/- with interest. The insurance company appealed, contending that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence as he was driving his motorcycle on the wrong side of the road and dashed against the truck. The High Court examined the evidence, including the police panchnama and spot map, which indicated that the accident occurred on the correct side of the truck, implying that the deceased was on the wrong side. The court found that the Tribunal had ignored this crucial evidence and erroneously held the truck driver solely negligent. The High Court held that the deceased contributed to the accident by his own negligence and apportioned liability equally, reducing the compensation by 50%. The court also noted that the claimants were parents and not dependents, but did not disturb the quantum of compensation otherwise. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award to reduce the compensation by half.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The deceased motorcyclist was found to have contributed to the accident by driving on the wrong side of the road. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in not considering contributory negligence and reduced the compensation by 50% - Held that the claimant's negligence must be considered in determining compensation (Paras 10-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deceased motorcyclist was guilty of contributory negligence and whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal should be reduced accordingly.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The award of the Tribunal is modified. The compensation is reduced by 50% on account of contributory negligence of the deceased. The insurance company is liable to pay 50% of the awarded amount with proportionate costs and interest.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Negligence of deceased
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 1

First Appeal No. 3090 of 2018

2019-08-13

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. V.N. Upadhye for appellant, Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar holding for Mr. L.B. Pallod for respondents no.01 and 02

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Murlidhar s/o. Surajmal Kabra, Kantabai w/o. Murlidhar Kabra, Rushikesh s/o. Appaso Satbhai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation on ground of contributory negligence of deceased

Filing Reason

Deceased died in motor vehicle accident; Tribunal held truck driver solely negligent; insurance company appealed

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar awarded Rs. 15,50,000/- with interest

Issues

Whether the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence? Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal should be reduced?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deceased was driving on the wrong side of the road and dashed against the truck, as per police panchnama and spot map. Respondents argued that the truck driver was solely negligent and the Tribunal correctly assessed compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the deceased motorcyclist drives on the wrong side of the road and causes an accident, he is guilty of contributory negligence, and the compensation must be reduced proportionately.

Judgment Excerpts

The police panchnama and spot map clearly indicate that the accident occurred on the correct side of the truck, implying that the deceased was on the wrong side. The Tribunal has erred in not considering the contributory negligence of the deceased. We hold that the deceased was equally responsible for the accident.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar. Tribunal awarded compensation. Insurance company filed first appeal before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that contributory negligence of deceased motorcyclist must be considered when calculating compensati...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Permanent Exemption Order in Criminal Complaint Case — Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC. Trial Court's Order Granting Permanent Exemption to Accused Residing Abroad Set Aside as It Amounts to Failure to Secure...