Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR for Abetment of Suicide Against Married Woman. Single Slap Without Intent to Abet Suicide Does Not Attract Section 306 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Savita Mohurle, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No.205 of 2018 registered at Sindewahi Police Station for offence under Section 306 IPC. The FIR was based on a report by respondent no.2, a police officer, following an inquiry under Section 174 CrPC into the death of Pravin Gahane, who died by hanging on 21.4.2018. The sole allegation against the applicant was that she slapped the deceased on the day of the incident at around 3.30 p.m. while he was talking on his mobile phone at a pan shop, thinking the conversation was about her. The applicant argued that this act did not constitute abetment of suicide as there was no intention or instigation. The State opposed the application. The court, after hearing both sides and perusing the case diary, found that the ingredients of Section 306 IPC were not attracted as there was no mens rea or active abetment. The court quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom, allowing the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Ingredients of abetment - The court considered whether a single slap given by the applicant to the deceased, without any intention or knowledge that it would lead to suicide, amounts to abetment of suicide. Held that mere slapping, without any instigation or active role in the suicide, does not attract Section 306 IPC as the essential ingredients of abetment are absent. (Paras 3-4)

B) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Inherent powers - The court examined the scope of quashing FIR when no prima facie case is made out. Held that where the allegations do not disclose any offence, the FIR can be quashed to prevent abuse of process of law. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the allegations of slapping the deceased constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, warranting quashing of FIR.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed FIR No.205 of 2018 and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide requires mens rea and active instigation
  • mere slapping without intention to cause suicide does not constitute abetment
  • FIR can be quashed if no prima facie case under Section 306 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (07) 220

Criminal Application (APL) No.491 of 2018

2019-07-23

P.N.Deshmukh, Pushpa V. Ganediwalia

Mr.T.G.Bansod for Applicant, Mr.S.D.Sirpurkar (APP) for Respondent/State

Sau.Savita w/o. Vinod Mohurle

The State of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O., Police Station, Sindewahi, Distt.Chandrapur; Ramesh M. Padhal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR for offence under Section 306 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.205 of 2018 and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Filing Reason

Applicant was falsely implicated in a case of abetment of suicide based on an allegation that she slapped the deceased.

Previous Decisions

Interim order dated 9.10.2018 restraining prosecution from filing chargesheet.

Issues

Whether the allegations in the FIR constitute an offence under Section 306 IPC? Whether the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the only allegation is of slapping the deceased, which does not amount to abetment of suicide as there is no intention or instigation. State opposed the application, supporting the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi

Mere slapping of the deceased, without any intention or knowledge that it would lead to suicide, does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC as the essential ingredients of abetment are absent.

Judgment Excerpts

It is submitted that, only because of this incident, it is the case of prosecution that the deceased committed suicide. since no ingredients necessary to constitute offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code can be said to be attracted against the applicant nor she can be said to have any object or intention to abet suicide

Procedural History

FIR No.205 of 2018 registered on 22.4.2018 at Sindewahi Police Station for offence under Section 306 IPC. Applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No.491 of 2018 under Section 482 CrPC. Interim order dated 9.10.2018 restraining filing of chargesheet. Application heard and finally disposed on 23.7.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 306
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 174, 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Prosecutrix Being a Willing Companion Above 16 Years. Consent and Age of Prosecutrix Established Through Evidence, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 363 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR for Abetment of Suicide Against Married Woman. Single Slap Without Intent to Abet Suicide Does Not Attract Section 306 IPC.