Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict Despite Previous Overstay, Emphasizes Rehabilitation and Changed Circumstances. Past conduct of overstaying furlough by 2719 days in 2010 cannot be a perpetual bar when the prisoner has since remained in continuous custody for over 22 years and has a surety.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 27
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dhananjay S/o Laxman Thorat, a convict undergoing life imprisonment at Nashik Road Central Jail, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the rejection of his furlough application by the prison authorities. The rejection was based on an adverse police report and the alleged unavailability of his son to stand as surety. The petitioner had been in continuous custody since April 2010, having overstayed a previous furlough by 2719 days in 2002, but had since then been in jail without any further incident. His actual undergone period was more than 15 years and 3 months, and with remission, it exceeded 22 years. The court noted that the son had filed an affidavit dated 05.01.2019 expressing readiness to stand as surety, and the appointed counsel confirmed the son's continued willingness. The court held that the ground of absence of surety was not valid. Regarding the previous overstay, the court observed that it occurred in 2002 and the petitioner had been continuously in jail since April 2010, making the stale incident an insufficient ground for rejection. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondents to release the petitioner on furlough on such terms and conditions as they deem fit, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of furlough.

Headnote

A) Prisons and Prisoners - Furlough - Rejection of Furlough Application - Grounds of Adverse Police Report and Absence of Surety - The court held that the ground of absence of surety was not valid as the son had filed an affidavit and expressed readiness to stand as surety. The previous conduct of overstaying furlough by 2719 days in 2010 was too old and could not be a ground for rejection when the prisoner had been continuously in jail since then and had undergone more than 22 years of imprisonment including remission. The order of rejection was set aside and furlough was granted. (Paras 2-3)

B) Prisons and Prisoners - Furlough - Right of Prisoner - The court recognized that furlough is a right of a prisoner to maintain family and social ties, and rejection must be based on valid and current grounds, not stale incidents. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the rejection of a furlough application on the grounds of an adverse police report and the alleged unavailability of a surety is sustainable when the prisoner has undergone a long period of continuous imprisonment and the son has expressed readiness to stand as surety.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The order of the respondents rejecting the furlough application is set aside. The respondents are directed to release the petitioner on furlough on such terms and conditions as they deem fit.

Law Points

  • Furlough is a right of a prisoner
  • not a privilege
  • subject to good conduct and public interest
  • past misconduct cannot be the sole ground for rejection if there is significant subsequent good conduct
  • the availability of a surety is a relevant factor but not an absolute condition
  • the purpose of furlough is to maintain family and social ties for reformation.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (07) 37

Criminal Writ Petition No.960 of 2019

2019-07-09

T.V. Nalawade, K.K. Sonawane

R.S. Banik (for petitioner), Mrs. V.S. Chaudhary (APP for respondents)

Dhananjay S/o Laxman Thorat

The State of Maharashtra, The Additional Director General of Police and Inspector General (Prison), The Deputy Inspector General (Prison), The Jail Superintendent

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition challenging rejection of furlough application.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the order rejecting his furlough application and direction to release him on furlough.

Filing Reason

Rejection of furlough application on grounds of adverse police report and alleged unavailability of son as surety.

Previous Decisions

The prison authorities rejected the furlough application. The petitioner had overstayed a previous furlough by 2719 days in 2002, but had been continuously in jail since April 2010.

Issues

Whether the rejection of furlough on the ground of absence of surety is valid when the son has expressed readiness to stand as surety. Whether the previous conduct of overstaying furlough by 2719 days in 2002 can be a ground for rejection when the prisoner has been continuously in jail since 2010 and has undergone over 22 years of imprisonment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the son had filed an affidavit and was ready to stand as surety. Respondents relied on the adverse police report and the previous overstay as grounds for rejection.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the ground of absence of surety was not valid as the son had expressed readiness. The previous overstay of 2719 days in 2002 was too stale to be a ground for rejection when the prisoner had been continuously in jail since April 2010 and had undergone more than 22 years of imprisonment including remission. Furlough is a right to maintain family and social ties, and rejection must be based on valid and current grounds.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of this circumstance, this Court holds that the ground of absence of surety could not have been valid ground. In view of this circumstances, this Court holds that the previous conduct which was of prior to April 2010 cannot become a ground for rejection of the furlough.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Criminal Writ Petition in the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad challenging the order of the respondents rejecting his furlough application. The court heard both sides and disposed of the petition by setting aside the impugned order and directing release on furlough.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict Despite Previous Overstay, Emphasizes Rehabilitation and Changed Circumstances. Past conduct of overstaying furlough by 2719 days in 2010 cannot be a perpetual bar when the prisoner has since remained in c...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disqualified Councillor in Municipal Disqualification Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Denial of Cross-Examination in Disqualification Proceedings Under Section 16(1)(h) and (i) of Maharashtra Municipal Coun...