Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Private School Teachers for Salary as per Pay Commission Reports. Teachers in Unaided Private School Entitled to Salary Under Rule 7 of MEPS Rules, 1981 and Pay Commission Reports.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 58
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, qualified permanent teachers working in the fifth respondent school, an unaided private secondary English medium school recognized by the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. They sought a direction to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 (the school and its management) to pay salary and other allowances as per the scales prescribed under Rule 7 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981, and in accordance with the reports of the 5th and 6th Pay Commissions, including arrears and difference in salary due to revision of scales. The petitioners were governed by the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and the Rules of 1981. The 5th Pay Commission report was implemented with effect from 1/1/1996, but the school did not implement it fully, paying only a slight increase. The petitioners repeatedly requested the school to pay salary according to the prescribed scales. The court considered the applicability of the Act and Rules to unaided private schools and held that the school is bound to pay salary in accordance with the prescribed scales and Pay Commission reports. The court directed the respondent school to pay the petitioners' salary as per Rule 7 and the 5th and 6th Pay Commission reports, with arrears, within a specified period.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Salary Fixation - Pay Commission Reports - Rule 7 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - The petitioners, permanent teachers in an unaided private school, sought direction to respondent school to pay salary as per Rule 7 and 5th and 6th Pay Commission reports. The court held that the school is bound to pay salary in accordance with the prescribed scales and Pay Commission reports, as the Act and Rules apply to all recognized private schools, whether aided or unaided. (Paras 1-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, teachers in an unaided private school, are entitled to salary as per the scales prescribed under Rule 7 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 and in accordance with the 5th and 6th Pay Commission reports.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to pay the petitioners' salary as per Rule 7 of the MEPS Rules, 1981 and in accordance with the 5th and 6th Pay Commission reports, including arrears, within a specified period.

Law Points

  • Salary fixation under Rule 7 of MEPS Rules
  • 1981
  • Implementation of Pay Commission reports
  • Applicability of MEPS Act to unaided private schools
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (06) 113

WRIT PETITION NO. 242 OF 2013

2019-06-27

S.C. Dharmadhikari, M.S. Karnik

Ms. Prachi Khandge I/b. M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for petitioners, Ms. Hiral Vora I/b. Maniar Srivastava Associates for respondent No.6, Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4

Manojkumar S. Amare and ors.

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to pay salary as per prescribed scales and Pay Commission reports.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to pay salary and allowances as per Rule 7 of MEPS Rules, 1981 and 5th and 6th Pay Commission reports, including arrears.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of salary as per prescribed scales and Pay Commission reports by the school.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to salary as per Rule 7 of MEPS Rules, 1981 and Pay Commission reports. Whether the Act and Rules apply to unaided private schools.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are entitled to salary as per Rule 7 and Pay Commission reports. Respondents likely argued that the school is unaided and not bound by the Pay Commission reports.

Ratio Decidendi

The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and the Rules of 1981 apply to all recognized private schools, including unaided schools. Therefore, the school is bound to pay salary as per Rule 7 and the Pay Commission reports.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are praying for direction to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to pay the salary and other allowances and all other perks to the petitioners as per the scales prescribed under Rule 7 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 and in accordance with the reports of the 5th and 6th Pay Commissions, including the arrears and the difference in salary due to revision of scales.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 242 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court. The petition was reserved on 7th March 2019 and pronounced on 27th June 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981: Rule 7
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Private School Teachers for Salary as per Pay Commission Reports. Teachers in Unaided Private School Entitled to Salary Under Rule 7 of MEPS Rules, 1981 and Pay Commission Reports.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Transfers Investigation of Custodial Murder to CBI and Directs Registration of FIR Against Police Officers. The court found that the victim died due to injuries sustained while in police custody and that the investigation by CID was...