Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offence Proceedings. Settlement Between Complainant and Accused Cannot Justify Quashing of Section 307 IPC Charges as Offence is Non-Compoundable Under Section 320 CrPC.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings against Kalyan Singh and others for offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 IPC. The complainant, Birbal Sharma, had filed a complaint alleging that the accused fired twice at him with a countrymade pistol. The accused filed an application under Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled with the complainant, who submitted an affidavit supporting the quashing. The High Court allowed the application, quashing the proceedings solely on the ground of settlement. The Supreme Court held that the High Court committed a grave error because the offences under Section 307 IPC are non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC. The Court relied on its earlier decision in Gulab Das v. State of M.P., which held that even if there is a settlement, criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences like Section 307 IPC cannot be quashed. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed that the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 23 of 2013) be proceeded with in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Non-compoundable offences - Section 482 CrPC - Settlement between complainant and accused cannot be a ground to quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences like Section 307 IPC - High Court erred in quashing proceedings solely on settlement - Held that offences under Section 307 IPC are non-compoundable and serious, and quashing on settlement is impermissible (Paras 3-4).

B) Indian Penal Code - Offence under Section 307 - Non-compoundable - Section 320 CrPC - Attempt to murder is a serious offence and cannot be compounded - Even if parties settle, criminal proceedings must continue - Held that High Court's order quashing proceedings for Section 307 IPC was erroneous and set aside (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC solely on the ground of settlement between complainant and accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment and order of High Court quashed and set aside. Criminal proceedings being Crime No. 23 of 2013 under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 IPC registered at Police Station Maharajpur, District Gwalior to be proceeded further in accordance with law and on its own merits.

Law Points

  • Non-compoundable offences cannot be quashed on basis of settlement
  • Section 307 IPC is non-compoundable
  • Section 482 CrPC cannot override Section 320 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (1) 48

Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5632 of 2014)

2019-01-04

D. Y. Chandrachud, M. R. Shah

Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi (for appellant), Ms. Malini Poduval (for respondents)

State of Madhya Pradesh

Kalyan Singh & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against High Court order quashing criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences

Remedy Sought

State sought setting aside of High Court order and restoration of criminal proceedings

Filing Reason

High Court quashed proceedings under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 IPC solely on ground of settlement between complainant and accused

Previous Decisions

High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6075 of 2013 quashed the criminal proceedings

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC solely on the ground of settlement between complainant and accused.

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 IPC are non-compoundable and serious, and quashing on settlement is impermissible. Accused argued that the dispute was amicably settled and complainant had no objection to quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

Criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences, such as under Section 307 IPC, cannot be quashed under Section 482 CrPC solely on the ground of settlement between the complainant and the accused, as the offence is non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC and involves serious allegations.

Judgment Excerpts

It is not in dispute that as per Section 20 of the Cr.PC offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 of the IPC are noncompoundable. Despite any settlement between the Complainant on the one hand and the accused on the other, the criminal proceedings for the offences under Section 307 of the IPC cannot be quashed, as the offence under Section 307 is a noncompoundable offence.

Procedural History

Complainant Birbal Sharma filed complaint leading to Crime No. 23/2013 under Sections 307, 294/34 IPC. Accused filed bail application which was rejected by Sessions Court. Accused then filed Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6075/2013 under Section 482 CrPC before High Court to quash proceedings. High Court quashed proceedings on 29.7.2018. State appealed to Supreme Court by SLP (Crl.) No. 5632/2014, which was converted to Criminal Appeal No. 14/2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307, 294, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482, 320
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Central Government's Appeal on Interest Calculation in Land Acquisition Execution Proceedings. Interest on Solatium Payable Only from Date of Sunder Judgment (19-09-2001) When Not Specifically Granted in Decree Under Land Acquisi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Judgment Upholding Tender Conditions for ICDS Nutrition Supply — Tender Conditions Ousting Local Women's Groups Held Arbitrary and Contrary to PUCL Directions. The Court Reiterated That Contracts for ...