Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation or Intentional Aiding. Allegations of Harassment and Liquor Consumption Do Not Constitute Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 147
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Prahaldrao Sangram Patil and Dattatrya Laxman Kotnod, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0362 of 2018 registered at Mukhed Police Station, District Nanded, for offences under Sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 504 and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Shakuntalabai Narsingrao Patil, mother of the deceased Shivshankar. The marriage of Shivshankar with Ashwini @ Pooja was solemnized on 14-06-2013. Allegedly, Ashwini had an immoral relationship with one Datta Chintalwad, leading to frequent quarrels. Between 24-11-2018 and 27-11-2018, the in-laws of Shivshankar and the applicants allegedly served excessive liquor to him under the pretext of a salary increase. On 27-11-2018, they visited the complainant's house, reprimanded Shivshankar for suspecting his wife's character, hurled abuses, damaged household articles, and took Ashwini away. Subsequently, Shivshankar committed suicide. The applicants sought quashing on the ground that the allegations did not constitute abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC. The court examined the FIR and charge-sheet and found no direct instigation or intentional aiding by the applicants. The court held that mere harassment, family quarrels, or allegations of immoral character without instigation do not amount to abetment. The court also noted that the deceased was a mature person and the alleged acts did not drive him to suicide. Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and all proceedings against the applicants.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if the allegations do not disclose any offence or are frivolous/vexatious. (Para 1)

B) Indian Penal Code - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Ingredients - For conviction under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation, incitement, or intentional aiding that drive the deceased to commit suicide. Mere harassment, family quarrels, or allegations of immoral character without instigation do not constitute abetment. (Paras 5-7)

C) Indian Penal Code - Unlawful Assembly - Sections 143, 147, 149 IPC - Applicability - Where the main offence under Section 306 IPC fails, the ancillary charges under Sections 143, 147, 149 IPC also cannot stand. (Para 8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 504 and 306 IPC against the applicants should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC for lack of ingredients of abetment to suicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed FIR No. 0362 of 2018 and all proceedings against the applicants.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide requires direct instigation or intentional aiding
  • mere harassment or family quarrels insufficient
  • Section 306 IPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (06) 34

Criminal Application No. 590 of 2019

2019-06-04

T.V. Nalawade, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. Gajanan S. Shembole for Appellant, Mr. D.R. Kale APP for Respondent-State, Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar for Respondent No. 2

Prahaldrao S/o Sangram Patil and Dattatrya S/o Laxman Kotnod

The State of Maharashtra and Shakuntalabai W/o Narsingrao Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 0362 of 2018 and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Filing Reason

Allegations in FIR did not constitute offence under Section 306 IPC as there was no instigation or intentional aiding to commit suicide.

Issues

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet disclose ingredients of abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC? Whether the High Court should exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that there was no instigation or intentional aiding to commit suicide; mere family quarrels and allegations of immoral character do not constitute abetment. Respondents argued that the applicants served excessive liquor and harassed the deceased, which drove him to suicide.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation, incitement, or intentional aiding that drive the deceased to commit suicide. Mere harassment, family quarrels, or allegations of immoral character without instigation do not constitute abetment. The High Court can quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC if the allegations do not disclose any offence.

Judgment Excerpts

For the purpose of conviction under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation, incitement or intentional aiding that drive the deceased to commit suicide. Mere harassment, family quarrels or allegations of immoral character without instigation do not constitute abetment.

Procedural History

FIR No. 0362 of 2018 was registered at Mukhed Police Station on 04-12-2018. The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 590 of 2019 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of the FIR. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 04-06-2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 147, 149, 323, 504, 306
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal, Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Joint Family Property. The trial court's decree was set aside due to improper appreciation of evidence and failure to frame proper issues regarding the ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Non-Examination of Key Witness and Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act. Sale Deed in Favour of Plaintiffs Proved Valid, Subsequent Transfers by Vendor After Losing Ti...