Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Petitioner's Premises in Jaipur Raided by Rajasthan Authorities, FIR Registered in Aurangabad Without Sanction Under Section 155 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 44
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Avadhesh Mukutbihari Sharma, a resident of Jaipur, Rajasthan, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR No.334/2016 registered at CIDCO Police Station, Aurangabad, and the consequential Charge Sheet No.301/2017 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad. The facts reveal that on 2 November 2015, the Drug Controlling Authority, Jaipur, conducted a raid on the petitioner's premises in Jaipur, finding drugs, manufacturing machinery, and packing materials. The labels on the drugs falsely indicated manufacture by M/s Avya Health Care, Rudrapur, which was found non-existent. The Jaipur police registered a crime and arrested the petitioner. Subsequently, the Aurangabad police registered the impugned FIR based on information from the Jaipur police, alleging offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner argued that the Aurangabad police lacked territorial jurisdiction as the entire incident occurred in Jaipur. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which requires prior sanction for investigation of non-cognizable offences outside jurisdiction. The court held that the Aurangabad police had no jurisdiction to investigate the matter without such sanction, and the FIR was liable to be quashed. The court allowed the petition, quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Territorial Jurisdiction - Section 155 CrPC - Lack of Sanction - FIR registered at Aurangabad for offences allegedly committed in Jaipur, Rajasthan - Held that the police in Aurangabad had no jurisdiction to investigate the matter without prior sanction under Section 155 CrPC, as the offence was not cognizable within their jurisdiction (Paras 1-10).

B) Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Quashing of FIR - Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction - Petitioner's premises in Jaipur raided by Rajasthan Drug Controlling Authority, drugs and machinery seized - FIR registered in Aurangabad based on information from Jaipur police - Held that the entire cause of action arose in Jaipur, and the Aurangabad police lacked jurisdiction to investigate (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered at Aurangabad police station for offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is maintainable when the alleged incident occurred entirely within the territorial jurisdiction of Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR No.334/2016 registered with CIDCO Police Station, Aurangabad and the consequential Charge Sheet No.301/2017 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad are quashed.

Law Points

  • Territorial jurisdiction
  • Lack of sanction under Section 155 CrPC
  • Quashing of FIR under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (05) 3

Criminal Writ Petition No.1355 of 2017

2019-05-02

SS. Shinde, R.G. Avachat

Shri R.R. Mantri for petitioner, Shri S.B. Yawalkar, A.P.P. for respondents

Avadhesh Mukutbihari Sharma

The State of Maharashtra, The State of Maharashtra (Home Department), Police Station Officer, CIDCO, Aurangabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge sheet.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.334/2016 registered at CIDCO Police Station, Aurangabad and consequential Charge Sheet No.301/2017.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the FIR on the ground that the Aurangabad police lacked territorial jurisdiction to investigate the matter as the alleged incident occurred entirely in Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Issues

Whether the FIR registered at Aurangabad police station is maintainable when the alleged incident occurred in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Whether the Aurangabad police had jurisdiction to investigate without prior sanction under Section 155 CrPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the entire cause of action arose in Jaipur, Rajasthan, and the Aurangabad police had no jurisdiction to investigate. Respondents argued that the FIR was registered based on information from Jaipur police and the court had jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The police in Aurangabad lacked territorial jurisdiction to investigate the matter as the alleged incident occurred entirely in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Without prior sanction under Section 155 CrPC, the investigation was invalid, and the FIR was liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

This Criminal Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks quashing of F.I.R., being Crime No.334/2016, registered with CIDCO, Aurangabad Police Station and consequential Charge Sheet (No.301/2017) pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad. The facts necessary for deciding the present Writ Petition are as follows : The petitioner is a resident of Jaipur (Rajasthan State). On 2.11.2015, the Drug Controlling Authority, Jaipur effected raid on the premises falling within the jurisdiction of Shipra Path Police Station, Jaipur.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1355 of 2017 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of FIR No.334/2016 and Charge Sheet No.301/2017. The judgment was reserved on 13 February 2019 and pronounced on 2 May 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 155
  • Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940:
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Petitioner's Premises in Jaipur Raided by Rajasthan Authorities, FIR Registered in Aurangabad Without Sanction Under Section 155 CrPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Permission for Sale of Trust Property Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Court Held That the Charity Commissioner's Refusal Was Justified as the Trust Failed to Show Ur...