Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder by Running Vehicle Over Victim — Altercation Preceding Act Constitutes Intent Under Section 302 IPC. The court held that driving a vehicle over a person after a verbal exchange demonstrates intention to cause death, not merely knowledge of likelihood.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 171
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shivanand @ Pampu Arvind Dhepe, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.194 of 2009 for the murder of Amol Anna Gund under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and for driving without a licence under Sections 3(1) and 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/- for murder, and one month imprisonment with a fine of Rs.200/- for the motor vehicle offence. The prosecution case was that on 20th April 2009, the deceased along with others attended a marriage and were returning in a Tumtum vehicle. At around 00:45 hours, near Indian Oil Corporation compound, a Mahindra Pickup Jeep driven by the appellant came from the opposite direction and stopped. An altercation ensued between the appellant and the deceased. The appellant, instigated by co-accused, drove the vehicle over the deceased, crushing his head and causing instantaneous death. The appellant challenged his conviction before the Bombay High Court, primarily arguing that the offence should be under Section 304 Part II IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) as there was no intention to cause death. The court examined the evidence, including eyewitness testimony, and found that the appellant deliberately drove the vehicle on the victim after a verbal exchange, which indicated an intention to cause death. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, noting that the act of running over a person with a vehicle after an altercation demonstrates clear intent. The conviction under the Motor Vehicles Act was also upheld. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Intention to cause death - Appellant drove a Mahindra Pickup Jeep over the victim after an altercation, crushing his head and causing instantaneous death - The court held that the act of driving the vehicle on the victim after a verbal exchange and instigation by co-accused demonstrated clear intention to cause death, not merely knowledge of likelihood - Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld (Paras 1-18).

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Driving without licence - Sections 3(1) and 181 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Appellant was driving the vehicle without a valid driving licence - Conviction and sentence of one month imprisonment and fine of Rs.200/- upheld (Paras 1-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by driving a vehicle over the victim is sustainable or the offence falls under Section 304 Part II IPC

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3(1) and 181 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 upheld.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • culpable homicide amounting to murder
  • intention to cause death
  • knowledge of likelihood of death
  • motor vehicle used as weapon
  • Section 3(1) and 181 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 234

Criminal Appeal No.1139 of 2011

2019-03-29

B. P. Dharmadhikari, Prakash D. Naik

Mr. Daulat Khamkar, Advocate for the Appellant; Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent–State

Shivanand @ Pampu Arvind Dhepe

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and motor vehicle offence

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of conviction to Section 304 Part II IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the judgment and order of conviction dated 20th July 2011 passed by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.194 of 2009

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3(1) and 181 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; acquitted under Sections 143, 147, 506 read with 149 IPC

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable or the offence falls under Section 304 Part II IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no intention to cause death and the act was a result of sudden altercation, thus offence should be under Section 304 Part II IPC State argued that the appellant deliberately drove the vehicle over the victim after altercation, demonstrating intention to cause death, and conviction under Section 302 IPC is correct

Ratio Decidendi

The act of driving a vehicle over a person after an altercation, with the head being crushed, demonstrates an intention to cause death, not merely knowledge of likelihood of death, and thus constitutes murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has preferred this Appeal under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure challenging judgment and order dated 20th July, 2011, passed by 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.194 of 2009. Accused no.1 and Amol Gund got down from the vehicle. Accused no.1 questioned Amol Gund. There was exchange of words between both of them. Other persons instigated accused no.1 to drive the vehicle on the person of Amol Gund. In pursuant to that accused no.1 (appellant) drove the vehicle on the person of Amol Gund. The head of Amol Gund was smashed under the vehicle driven by accused no.1 and he died on the spot.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur on 20th July 2011 in Sessions Case No.194 of 2009. He appealed to the Bombay High Court under Section 374(2) CrPC. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 29th March 2019, dismissing the appeal and upholding the conviction.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304 Part II, 143, 147, 506, 149
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 3(1), 181
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 374(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Look Out Circular After Completion of Investigation; No Material Against Petitioner, No Complaint, No Flight Risk. Petition Allowed Under Article 226 and Section 528 BNSS as Continuation of LOC Amounted to Abuse of Process.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Partially Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation from Rs.1,40,000 to Rs.1,00,000 with 6% Interest. Court holds that market value of acquired land must be determined based on comparable sa...