Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Appointment of Arbitrator Under Arbitration Act, 1940 — Limitation Issue Resolved.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from four agreements between the Union of India and L.K. Ahuja & Co. for construction work, which were executed and completed on various dates. After the completion, the respondent claimed an outstanding amount of Rs. 1,91,137 and sought arbitration for the dispute. The initial application for appointment of an arbitrator was dismissed by the Civil Judge on the grounds of limitation. However, the High Court allowed the appeal, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court. The core legal question was whether the application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act was within the limitation period. The Supreme Court referenced established precedents, particularly the decision in Kerala State Electricity Board v. T.P.K.K. Amsom, affirming that Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to applications under any Act in a Civil Court. The court clarified that the existence of an arbitration agreement and the assertion of a claim were sufficient for a valid reference to arbitration. The court concluded that the claim was made within three years from the date the dispute arose, thus the application was not barred by limitation. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were directed to be borne in the arbitration proceedings.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Limitation for Application - Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 20 - The court held that the application for appointment of an arbitrator was not barred by limitation as the claim was made within the stipulated time frame, and the existence of an arbitration agreement was established. The High Court's decision to allow the appeal was upheld. (Paras 404-408).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the application for appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was barred by limitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision that the application for appointment of an arbitrator was within the limitation period.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Limitation
  • Appointment of Arbitrator
  • Arbitration Agreement
  • Valid Claim
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1988 LawText (SC) (04) 34

Civil Appeal No 757 of 1988

1988-04-05

Sabyasachi Mukharji, Rangnathan, S.

1988 AIR 1172, 1988 SCR (3) 402, 1988 SCC (3) 76

G. Ramaswamy, Pramod Swarup, P. Parmeshwaran, R.P. Gupta

Union of India

L.K. Ahuja & Co.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration Act.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought the appointment of an arbitrator.

Filing Reason

Claim of outstanding payment for work executed.

Previous Decisions

The application was initially dismissed by the Civil Judge as barred by limitation.

Issues

Whether the application for appointment of an Arbitrator was barred by limitation. Existence of an arbitration agreement.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant contended that there was no dispute and the application was misconceived. The respondent argued that the claim was made within the limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, allowing claims to be made within three years from the date the dispute arose.

Judgment Excerpts

The sole question involved in this appeal was whether the Civil Judge was right in dismissing the application. It is well-settled in view of the decision of this Court in Kerala State Electricity Board, Trivendrum v. T.P.K.K. Amsom and Besom, Kerala, that Article 137 would apply to any petition or application filed under any Act in a Civil Court.

Procedural History

The application for appointment of an arbitrator was dismissed by the Civil Judge on 10th February 1978. An appeal was allowed by the High Court on 14th August 1986, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration Act, 1940: Section 20
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Article 137
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Order Partially Allowing Review of Amendment Application in Civil Suit. Civil Court Review of Amendment Allowing Addition of Declaratory Relief in Suit for Perpetual Injunction Examined Under Section 114 and Order...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Sitting Legislator's Challenge to Election Commission Enquiry in Disqualification Reference. Article 192(2) of Constitution of India Empowers Election Commission to Hold Enquiry Before Giving Opinion, and Any Citizen May Raise...