Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Professors Seeking Permanent Status and Benefits. University's Year-to-Year Appointments Held Invalid as Petitioners Were Appointed Against Clear Vacancies and Continued for Years.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 150
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, four individuals working as Assistant Professors at Shivaji University, Kolhapur, filed a writ petition seeking directions to treat them as permanent teachers and extend benefits. They were appointed on a year-to-year basis from 2012-13. The court, after hearing arguments, held that temporary appointments cannot be continued indefinitely when the work is perennial and vacancies are clear. The court directed the respondents to treat the petitioners as permanent Assistant Professors and extend all consequential benefits. The judgment was delivered by a division bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and Dama Seshadri Naidu on 27 March 2019.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization - Temporary Appointment - Petitioners appointed as Assistant Professors on year-to-year basis from 2012-13 - University continued them against clear vacancies - Held that such temporary appointments cannot be continued indefinitely and petitioners are entitled to regularization and permanent status (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, appointed as Assistant Professors on year-to-year basis, are entitled to be treated as permanent teachers and extended benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Rule made absolute. Respondents directed to treat petitioners as permanent teachers in the post of Assistant Professor and extend all consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Temporary appointment cannot be continued indefinitely
  • Appointments against clear vacancies must be regularized
  • Year-to-year appointments are invalid if work is perennial
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 201

Writ Petition No.12597 of 2017 along with Civil Application No.1853 of 2018

2019-03-27

B. R. GAVAI, DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU

Mr. S.S. Pakale alongwith Ms. Manisha Deokar i/b Mr. Shankar M. Katkar for the Petitioners, Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for the State/Respondent Nos. 1 and 4, Mr. Amit B. Borkar for Respondent No.3, Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi for Respondent No.5

Shri Mahesh Madhukar Wagh, Shri Prashant Pandurang Patil, Shri Balasaheb Babasaheb Patil, Miss Rupali Janardhan Dhabade

The State of Maharashtra, The Vice-Chancellor Shivaji University, Registrar Shivaji University, The Director of Technical Education, All India Council for Technical Education (A.I.C.T.E.)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking directions to treat petitioners as permanent teachers and extend benefits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought directions to respondents to treat them as permanent teachers in the post of Assistant Professor and extend benefits and facilities.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were appointed as Assistant Professors on year-to-year basis from 2012-13 and sought regularization.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to be treated as permanent teachers and extended benefits.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they have been appointed as Assistant Professors from 2012-13 on year-to-year basis and should be regularized.

Ratio Decidendi

Temporary appointments cannot be continued indefinitely; when appointments are against clear vacancies and work is perennial, the appointees are entitled to regularization.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners who are working as Assistant Professors with Respondent No.3 University, have approached this Court, praying for directions to the Respondents to treat the Petitioners as permanent teachers in the post of Assistant Professor and extend the benefits and facilities, as admissible to the said post and ancillary benefits.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed in 2017; rule issued and heard finally with consent of parties.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Professors Seeking Permanent Status and Benefits. University's Year-to-Year Appointments Held Invalid as Petitioners Were Appointed Against Clear Vacancies and Continued for Years.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Modifies Apportionment of Compensation Between Widow, Children, and Parents. Widow and Minor Children Held Entitled to Larger Share Than Aged Parents Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicl...