Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and Transfer Policy. Transfer Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions and Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 34
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 32 teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. The transfers were made under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The petitioners contended that the transfers were arbitrary, malafide, and in violation of the Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017, which laid down a transfer policy. They argued that the transfers were not in public interest but were punitive and without following the prescribed procedure. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Zilla Parishad, defended the transfers as administrative decisions taken in public interest. The court examined the relevant provisions of the Act and the Government Resolution. It found that the transfer orders did not comply with the statutory requirements and the policy. The court held that the transfers were illegal and arbitrary, and quashed them. The court also directed that the petitioners be allowed to continue at their original places of posting until further orders. The judgment emphasizes the need for adherence to statutory provisions and government policies in matters of transfer of employees.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Statutory Compliance - Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Section 268 - The petitioners, teachers employed by Zilla Parishad, challenged their transfer orders as being in violation of the Act and the Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017. The court held that the transfers were made without following the statutory procedure and the policy, and thus were illegal and arbitrary. (Paras 1-10)

B) Service Law - Transfer Policy - Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017 - The court examined the transfer policy and found that the impugned orders did not adhere to the criteria and procedure laid down therein. The transfers were quashed and set aside. (Paras 5-8)

C) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - The court noted that the petitioners were not given any opportunity of hearing before the transfer orders were passed, which is a violation of principles of natural justice. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer orders of the petitioners, who are teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, are illegal and arbitrary, being in violation of the provisions of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and the Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the transfer orders, and directed that the petitioners be allowed to continue at their original places of posting until further orders.

Law Points

  • Transfer orders must comply with statutory provisions and government policy
  • Transfer policy cannot be overridden by administrative orders
  • Right to be heard before adverse transfer
  • Judicial review of administrative action
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (02) 100

Writ Petition No. 4190 of 2018

2019-03-01

Bandu Bhauji Sidam and others

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging transfer orders of teachers employed by Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of transfer orders and direction to allow petitioners to continue at their original places of posting.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that transfer orders were arbitrary, malafide, and in violation of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and the Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017.

Issues

Whether the transfer orders are in violation of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and the Government Resolution dated 15.06.2017? Whether the transfer orders are arbitrary and illegal?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that transfers were made without following statutory procedure and policy, and were punitive. Respondents argued that transfers were administrative decisions taken in public interest.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer orders must comply with statutory provisions and government policy; otherwise, they are illegal and arbitrary. The court has the power to quash such orders in judicial review.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned transfer orders are quashed and set aside. The petitioners shall be allowed to continue at their original places of posting until further orders.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4190 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 01.03.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961: Section 268
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Employee Transferred to Central University. Resignation for Public Employment Not Voluntary Abandonment, Pro Rata Pension Payable Under Rule 131 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and Transfer Policy. Transfer Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions and Governme...