Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The cheque was presented and dishonoured at a branch outside the court's jurisdiction, making the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not maintainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 21
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Barakara Abdul Aziz, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3146 of 2012 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmednagar, arising out of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The respondent, National Bank of Oman, through its power of attorney holder, had filed the complaint alleging that a cheque issued by the applicant was dishonoured. The applicant contended that the cheque was presented at the bank's Abu Dhabi branch and dishonoured there, and that the Ahmednagar court had no territorial jurisdiction as no part of the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction. The respondent argued that the cheque was issued at Ahmednagar and the bank's branch at Ahmednagar was the drawee branch. The court examined the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 177 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It noted that the cheque was presented at the Abu Dhabi branch and dishonoured there, and the notice of dishonour was also issued from Abu Dhabi. The court held that the place of presentation and dishonour determines jurisdiction, and since these events occurred outside Ahmednagar, the complaint was not maintainable there. The court quashed the criminal proceedings, allowing the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Territorial Jurisdiction - Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The court held that the place where the cheque is presented and dishonoured determines territorial jurisdiction, not the place of issuance or the drawee bank's branch. Since the cheque was presented at the Abu Dhabi branch of the complainant bank and dishonoured there, the Ahmednagar court lacked jurisdiction. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court at Ahmednagar had territorial jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when the cheque was presented and dishonoured at a branch outside its jurisdiction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed Criminal Case No. 3146 of 2012 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmednagar.

Law Points

  • Territorial jurisdiction for cheque dishonour
  • Place of presentation of cheque determines jurisdiction
  • Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Criminal Procedure Code Section 177
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (10) 34

Criminal Application No. 3146 of 2012

0000-00-00

Shri V.D. Sapkal for applicant, Shri L.B. Pallod for respondent No.1, Shri S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for respondent No.2/State

Barakara Abdul Aziz

National Bank of Oman (S.A.O.G.) and State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Criminal Case No. 3146 of 2012 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmednagar.

Filing Reason

Lack of territorial jurisdiction as the cheque was presented and dishonoured at Abu Dhabi branch, not within Ahmednagar.

Issues

Whether the Ahmednagar court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the cheque was presented at Abu Dhabi branch and dishonoured there, so no cause of action arose in Ahmednagar. Respondent argued that the cheque was issued at Ahmednagar and the drawee branch was at Ahmednagar, so jurisdiction lies there.

Ratio Decidendi

The place where the cheque is presented and dishonoured determines territorial jurisdiction for a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Since the cheque was presented at the Abu Dhabi branch and dishonoured there, the Ahmednagar court lacked jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The cheque was presented at Abu Dhabi branch and dishonoured there. The Ahmednagar court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of Criminal Case No. 3146 of 2012 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmednagar, which was filed by the respondent bank under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 177, 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The cheque was presented and dishonoured at a branch outside the court's jurisdiction, making the complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating and Forgery Case — Dispute Essentially Civil in Nature. Allegations of Will forgery and cheating held to be civil disputes where criminal proceedings are an abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.