Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of Primary Ashram School in Solapur District — Government Resolution Allowing Transfer from Deggewadi to Yavatmal Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Policy and Lack of Opportunity to Petitioner. The court held that the transfer violated the State Government's policy prohibiting inter-district transfers of Ashram Schools except in exceptional circumstances, and that the petitioner's pending application for the same school was ignored.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 43
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a Government Resolution dated 30 August 2011 by which the Social Justice Department of Maharashtra allowed the transfer of a primary Ashram School from Deggewadi in Solapur district to Yavatmal district. The petitioner in Writ Petition No.949 of 2012, Jeevanjyoti Krida and Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, conducts a secondary school and a D.Ed. College in Solapur. In 2003, the petitioner had applied for a new primary Ashram School in Akkalkot taluka, Solapur, but no decision was communicated. Meanwhile, another trust, Shri Swami Samarth Shikshan Sanstha, was running a primary Ashram School at Deggewadi, which was closed on 18 October 2010 due to deficiencies. The fourth respondent applied for transfer of this school to Yavatmal, which was allowed by the impugned Government Resolution. The petitioner challenged this resolution, arguing that it violated the State Government's policy that Ashram Schools should not be transferred from one district to another except in exceptional circumstances, and that the petitioner's application for the same school should have been considered. The court examined the policy and found that the transfer was not justified as no exceptional circumstances were recorded. The court also noted that the petitioner was not given an opportunity of hearing before the transfer was granted. The court held that the transfer was arbitrary and contrary to the policy, and quashed the Government Resolution. The court directed the State Government to consider the petitioner's application for the Ashram School in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court also disposed of the connected writ petition as infructuous.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Ashram School Transfer - Government Policy - The State Government's policy prohibits transfer of Ashram Schools from one district to another except in exceptional circumstances with prior approval of the Social Justice Department - The impugned Government Resolution allowed transfer without recording any exceptional circumstances and without considering the petitioner's pending application for the same school - Held that the transfer was arbitrary and violative of the policy (Paras 2-10).

B) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - The petitioner, who had applied for the same Ashram School in 2003, was not given any opportunity of hearing before the transfer was granted to the fourth respondent - Held that the principle of audi alteram partem was violated (Paras 3-10).

C) Education Law - Ashram School - Policy of No New Permissions - The State Government had taken a policy decision in 2006 not to grant new permissions for primary Ashram Schools - However, the transfer of an existing school from one district to another amounts to creation of a new school in the transferee district, which is impermissible under the policy - Held that the transfer was contrary to the policy (Paras 3-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Government Resolution dated 30 August 2011 allowing transfer of a primary Ashram School from Deggewadi (Solapur) to Yavatmal is valid and whether the petitioner's application for the same school could be considered.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Government Resolution dated 30 August 2011, and directed the State Government to consider the petitioner's application for the Ashram School in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The connected writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Law Points

  • Administrative Law
  • Education Law
  • Government Policy
  • Natural Justice
  • Writ Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (09) 35

Writ Petition No.949 of 2012 with Writ Petition No.8386 of 2011

2012-09-10

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, A.A. Sayed

Mr. Anil Anturkar with Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmukh for the Petitioner, Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondents 1 to 3, Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.4

Jeevanjyoti Krida and Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Through its President, N.S. Survase

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a Government Resolution allowing transfer of a primary Ashram School from one district to another.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Government Resolution dated 30 August 2011 and direction to consider petitioner's application for the same Ashram School.

Filing Reason

The petitioner had applied for a new primary Ashram School in 2003, but the State Government allowed transfer of an existing school to another district without considering the petitioner's application and in violation of policy.

Previous Decisions

The erstwhile primary Ashram School at Deggewadi was derecognized and closed on 18 October 2010. The State Government had taken a policy decision on 31 May 2006 to reject all applications for new Ashram Schools.

Issues

Whether the Government Resolution allowing transfer of the Ashram School from Deggewadi to Yavatmal is valid under the State Government's policy. Whether the petitioner's application for the same school should have been considered before granting transfer to the fourth respondent. Whether the petitioner was entitled to an opportunity of hearing before the transfer was granted.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the transfer violated the State Government's policy that Ashram Schools should not be transferred from one district to another except in exceptional circumstances, and that no such circumstances were recorded. Petitioner argued that its application for the same school was pending since 2003 and should have been considered. Petitioner argued that it was not given any opportunity of hearing before the transfer was granted. Respondents argued that the transfer was justified due to the closure of the school at Deggewadi and the need to continue educational facilities.

Ratio Decidendi

The transfer of an Ashram School from one district to another is contrary to the State Government's policy unless exceptional circumstances exist, and such transfer cannot be granted without considering pending applications and without affording an opportunity of hearing to interested parties.

Judgment Excerpts

The policy of the State Government has been to provide educational facilities through Ashram Schools for the upliftment of the educational, social and economic status of students belonging to Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic Tribes. The transfer of a primary Ashram School from one district to another would be contrary to the policy of the State Government unless there are exceptional circumstances. The petitioner was not given any opportunity of hearing before the transfer was granted to the fourth respondent.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.949 of 2012 challenging the Government Resolution dated 30 August 2011. Another writ petition, No.8386 of 2011, was also filed by Rajendra Shankarappa Bodhale and others. Both petitions were heard together and disposed of by this judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of Primary Ashram School in Solapur District — Government Resolution Allowing Transfer from Deggewadi to Yavatmal Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Policy and Lack of Opportunity to Petitioner. The court held that...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in Civil Appeal Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree Without Examining Sufficient Cause Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and by Acting as Appell...