Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal, Holds ESI Court Cannot Waive Statutory Interest Under Regulation 31A of ESI (General) Regulations, 1950. The ESI Court's order waiving interest on delayed contributions was set aside as the interest is mandatory and not discretionary.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) appealed against an order of the ESI Court which, while disposing of an application challenging an order under Section 45A of the ESI Act, directed the appellant to recover a specific amount of Rs. 90,908/- withheld by the bank and held that the appellant was not entitled to claim any further interest. The appellant contended that the ESI Court had no power to waive statutory interest under Regulation 31A of the ESI (General) Regulations, 1950. The High Court, after hearing the appellant's counsel and perusing the impugned order and relevant regulations, held that Regulation 31A mandates payment of interest at 15% per annum in case of default, and the ESI Court has no jurisdiction to waive such interest. The court relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Goetze (India) Limited vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation (2008) 8 SCC 705. The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the ESI Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Employees' State Insurance - Interest on Delayed Contributions - Regulation 31A of ESI (General) Regulations, 1950 - Mandatory Nature - The ESI Court has no discretion to waive statutory interest payable under Regulation 31A when an employer defaults in paying contribution within the time prescribed under Regulation 31. The interest is mandatory and cannot be bypassed. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the ESI Court has discretionary power to waive interest under Regulation 31A of the Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950, when an employer commits default in paying contribution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order of ESI Court dated 21.06.2006 quashed and set aside. Matter remanded to ESI Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Statutory interest under Regulation 31A is mandatory
  • ESI Court has no discretion to waive interest
  • Regulation 31A overrides any discretionary power
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (04) 74

Appeal Under E.S.I. No. 7 of 2006

2012-04-09

F. M. Reis, J

Mr. P. A. Kholkar for the Appellant

The Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office Goa

Shri Shaikh Mustafa Kadar, M/s. Hotel Neptune, Shri Gurudas Mahadev Madkaikar, Indian Overseas Bank

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of ESI Court waiving statutory interest on delayed ESI contributions.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought quashing of ESI Court order that directed recovery of Rs. 90,908/- and barred claim for further interest.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged ESI Court's order as without jurisdiction to waive statutory interest under Regulation 31A.

Previous Decisions

ESI Court disposed of application under Section 45A directing appellant to recover Rs. 90,908/- and not to claim further interest.

Issues

Whether the ESI Court has discretionary power to waive interest under Regulation 31A of the ESI (General) Regulations, 1950.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that under Regulation 31A, interest at 15% per annum is mandatory on default, and ESI Court has no power to waive it. Appellant relied on Goetze (India) Limited vs. ESIC (2008) 8 SCC 705.

Ratio Decidendi

The ESI Court has no discretion to waive statutory interest payable under Regulation 31A of the ESI (General) Regulations, 1950, as the interest is mandatory and must be recovered in case of default.

Judgment Excerpts

the learned E.S.I. Court has no powers or jurisdiction to waive such amount on statutory interest the impugned Order passed by the E.S.I. Court deserves to be quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The ESI Court passed an order on 21.06.2006 in an application under Section 45A, directing the appellant to recover Rs. 90,908/- and not to claim further interest. The appellant appealed to the High Court on 21.06.2006, which admitted the appeal on the substantial question of law. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 09.04.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948: Section 45A
  • Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950: Regulation 31, Regulation 31A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty and Dismisses Wife's Appeal for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. False criminal complaints by wife constitute mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal, Holds ESI Court Cannot Waive Statutory Interest Under Regulation 31A of ESI (General) Regulations, 1950. The ESI Court's order waiving interest on delayed contributions was set aside as the interest ...