Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased pedestrian held 50% contributorily negligent for crossing highway without care; compensation reduced from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 with interest.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra and the Secretary of the Public Works Department appealed against a judgment and decree dated 6th May 2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Nashik, directing them to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000 with interest at 9% per annum to the original plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 6), who are the legal heirs of a deceased pedestrian. The accident occurred when the deceased was crossing a national highway and was hit by a government vehicle. The trial court held the driver of the government vehicle negligent and awarded compensation. The appellants contended that the deceased was contributorily negligent as he crossed the highway without looking for oncoming traffic. The High Court analyzed the evidence and found that the deceased failed to exercise reasonable care while crossing a busy highway, and thus contributed to the accident. The court apportioned liability equally between the driver and the deceased, reducing the compensation by 50%. The court also found the quantum of Rs.2,00,000 to be excessive for a 55-year-old pedestrian and reduced it to Rs.1,00,000 after applying contributory negligence. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the decree accordingly.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicle Accident - Contributory Negligence - Pedestrian Crossing Highway - Deceased pedestrian crossed a national highway without taking adequate care and was hit by a government vehicle - Held that the deceased was 50% contributorily negligent, reducing the compensation by half (Paras 8-12).

B) Motor Vehicle Accident - Compensation - Quantum - Trial court awarded Rs.2,00,000 as compensation for death of a 55-year-old pedestrian - Held that the amount was excessive and reduced to Rs.1,00,000 after applying contributory negligence (Paras 13-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deceased pedestrian was contributorily negligent in crossing the highway, and whether the compensation awarded by the trial court was excessive.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The judgment and decree of the trial court are modified. The appellants are directed to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000 (instead of Rs.2,00,000) with interest at 9% per annum from the date of suit till realization. The finding of contributory negligence is upheld, reducing the compensation by 50%.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor vehicle accident
  • Pedestrian crossing highway
  • Standard of care
  • Apportionment of liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (10) 66

First Appeal No.1210 of 2010

2011-10-19

A.S. Oka, J.

Mr. A.R. Patil, A.G.P for the appellants; Ms Jyoti Pande for the respondent nos.1 to 4

The State of Maharashtra & The Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra

Smt.U.P.Adke & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and decree in a motor accident compensation suit.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the trial court's decree awarding compensation to the respondents.

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the finding of negligence and the quantum of compensation awarded by the trial court.

Previous Decisions

Trial court (Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nashik) decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding Rs.2,00,000 with interest at 9% per annum.

Issues

Whether the deceased was contributorily negligent in crossing the highway. Whether the compensation awarded by the trial court was excessive.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the deceased crossed the highway without looking for oncoming traffic and was thus contributorily negligent. Respondents argued that the driver of the government vehicle was solely negligent and the deceased was not at fault.

Ratio Decidendi

A pedestrian crossing a highway must exercise reasonable care for his own safety. Failure to do so constitutes contributory negligence, and the compensation must be reduced proportionately.

Judgment Excerpts

The deceased crossed the highway without taking adequate care and was hit by the government vehicle. He contributed to the accident. The compensation of Rs.2,00,000 is excessive for a 55-year-old pedestrian. After applying contributory negligence, the amount is reduced to Rs.1,00,000.

Procedural History

The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit for compensation before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nashik, which was decreed on 6th May 2010. The State of Maharashtra and the Secretary of Public Works Department appealed to the High Court of Bombay by way of First Appeal No.1210 of 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased pedestrian held 50% contributorily negligent for crossing highway without care; compensation reduced from Rs.2...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Setting Aside Election of Councilor for Non-Disclosure of Criminal Cases. Failure to Disclose Pending Criminal Cases in Affidavit Under Section 5A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, ...