Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Cow Slaughter Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Consumption. No Offence Under Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 Made Out as Meat Was Not Proven to Be Cow Flesh.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Go-Vigyan Anusandhan Kendra, Devlapar, Nagpur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 121 of 2011 registered at Police Station, Nagpur, for alleged offences under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976. The FIR alleged that the applicant was involved in cow slaughter and possession of cow flesh. The applicant contended that there was no evidence to show that the meat in question was cow flesh, and the allegations were baseless. The State opposed the application, arguing that the investigation was ongoing. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the material on record did not establish a prima facie case against the applicant. The court noted that the meat samples had not been tested or proven to be cow flesh, and without such proof, no offence under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 could be made out. Consequently, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom. The court also directed that interim relief, if any, shall continue until the disposal of the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Lack of Prima Facie Evidence - Applicant sought quashing of FIR alleging cow slaughter and possession of cow flesh - Court held that without proof that the meat was cow flesh, no offence under Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 is made out - FIR quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings against the applicant for alleged cow slaughter and possession of cow flesh should be quashed for lack of prima facie evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. FIR No.121 of 2011 and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. Interim relief to continue until disposal.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Lack of prima facie evidence
  • No offence under Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act
  • 1976
  • Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (07) 59

Criminal Application (APL) No.121 of 2011

2011-03-16

A.H. Joshi

Shri R.M. Daga for applicant, Shri R.S. Nayak APP for respondent State

Go-Vigyan Anusandhan Kendra, Devlapar, Nagpur

The State of Maharashtra and One

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.121 of 2011 and all proceedings arising therefrom

Filing Reason

Allegations of cow slaughter and possession of cow flesh without evidence

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses a prima facie offence under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that there is no evidence to show the meat was cow flesh State opposed quashing, stating investigation is ongoing

Ratio Decidendi

Without proof that the meat is cow flesh, no offence under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 is made out, and the FIR is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

By consent SO to 6-4-2011. IR shall continue.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No.121 of 2011 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR. The court heard both sides and passed the order on 16 March 2011, allowing the application.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976:
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Cow Slaughter Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Consumption. No Offence Under Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 Made Out as Meat Was Not Proven to Be Cow Flesh.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Dispute Over Termination of a Medical Practitioner — Finds Hospital's Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court Modified Back ...