Bombay High Court Quashes Permission to Start College Granted Without University Recommendation. State Government Cannot Override University's Negative Recommendation Without Recording Reasons Under Section 82(5) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Shikshan Sanstha, challenged the grant of permission by the State Government to respondent no.4, Vidya Vikas Shikshan Sanstha, to start a college at Hinganghat. The University had not recommended the permission, citing lack of basic facilities. The petitioner argued that the permission was illegal as it was granted without the University's recommendation. The respondent contended that the Government could grant permission even without recommendation under the proviso to Section 82(5) of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. The Court examined Section 82(5) and its proviso, which allows the Government to grant permission without University recommendation only if it records reasons in writing. The Court found that the Government had not recorded any reasons for overriding the University's negative recommendation. Therefore, the permission was held to be illegal and was quashed. The Court also noted that the University's recommendation was based on the lack of basic facilities, and the Government's decision to grant permission without addressing this was arbitrary. The writ petition was allowed, and the permission granted to respondent no.4 was set aside.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Permission to Start College - Section 82(5) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - University Recommendation - The State Government granted permission to respondent no.4 to start a college despite the University not recommending it due to lack of basic facilities. The Court held that the proviso to Section 82(5) requires the State Government to record reasons in writing before granting permission without University recommendation. Since no reasons were recorded, the permission was illegal and quashed. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government can grant permission to start a new college under Section 82(5) of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, without the recommendation of the University and without recording reasons in writing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The permission granted to respondent no.4 to start a college at Hinganghat is quashed and set aside. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • University recommendation is mandatory for grant of permission to start a new college
  • State Government cannot grant permission without recommendation unless it records reasons in writing
  • Section 82(5) of Maharashtra Universities Act
  • 1994
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (03) 180

Writ Petition No. 4454/2009

2011-03-10

S. A. Bobde, S. B. Deshmukh

Mr. R. M. Ahirrao for petitioner, Mr. Anoop Parihar for respondent no.1, Mr. A. C. Dharmadhikari with Mr. R. V. Shiralkar for respondent no.4

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Shikshan Sanstha

State of Maharashtra, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Director College and University Development Corporation, Vidya Vikas Shikshan Sanstha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging grant of permission to start a college.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of permission granted to respondent no.4 to start a college.

Filing Reason

Permission was granted despite University not recommending it due to lack of basic facilities.

Issues

Whether the State Government can grant permission to start a new college without the recommendation of the University and without recording reasons in writing under Section 82(5) of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Permission is illegal as it was granted without University recommendation. Respondent no.4: Government is entitled to grant permission even without University recommendation by virtue of proviso to Section 82(5) of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 82(5) of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, the State Government may grant permission to start a new college without the recommendation of the University only if it records reasons in writing for doing so. In the absence of such reasons, the permission is illegal and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

From the record, it is clear that in spite of the fact that the University did not recommend to the State Government that the permission may be granted to respondent no.4, the said permission has been granted. The proviso to Section 82(5) of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, empowers the State Government to grant permission without recommendation but only after recording reasons in writing.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the grant of permission to respondent no.4 to start a college. The petition was heard and disposed of finally by consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994: 82(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Permission to Start College Granted Without University Recommendation. State Government Cannot Override University's Negative Recommendation Without Recording Reasons Under Section 82(5) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows EPFO's Writ Petition Challenging EPF Appellate Tribunal Order for Lack of Jurisdiction and Erroneous Application of Mens Rea. The Tribunal's order quashed as it entertained a time-barred appeal without condonation of delay an...