Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Axe Attack Case — Appellant's Guilt Established by Extra-Judicial Confession and Dying Declaration

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Bhimrao Shripat Khandare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.1144 of 2000 for the murder of his wife Lata and attempt to murder his daughter Rama, under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, respectively. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and seven years rigorous imprisonment for attempt to murder, with fines. The prosecution case was that on 11 August 2000, the appellant voluntarily came to a police chowkie holding a blood-stained axe and confessed to assaulting his wife and daughter. He led the police to the scene where his wife was found dead and his daughter injured. The injured daughter, while being taken to hospital, told the police constable that her father had assaulted them. The appellant appealed against his conviction. The High Court considered the evidence of extra-judicial confession and the dying declaration. The court held that the extra-judicial confession was voluntary and reliable, and the dying declaration was admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act as it related to the cause of her injuries. The court found no reason to disbelieve the prosecution witnesses and upheld the conviction and sentences, dismissing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder and Attempt to Murder - Extra-Judicial Confession - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302 and 307 - The appellant voluntarily surrendered at a police chowkie with a blood-stained axe and confessed to assaulting his wife and daughter - The court held that the extra-judicial confession was voluntary and reliable, and corroborated by the dying declaration of the injured daughter - Conviction upheld (Paras 3-5, 10-12).

B) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Admissibility - Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32(1) - The injured daughter, while being taken to hospital, told the police constable that her father had assaulted her and her mother with an axe - The court held that this statement was admissible as a dying declaration as it related to the cause of her injuries and was made under circumstances of impending death - Conviction upheld (Paras 5, 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable based on the evidence of extra-judicial confession and dying declaration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentences passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.1144 of 2000 are upheld.

Law Points

  • Extra-judicial confession
  • Dying declaration
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (11) 57

Criminal Appeal No.305 of 2005

2010-11-23

D.D. Sinha, Smt. V.K. Tahilramani

Mrs. Sonia Miskin (appointed) for the appellant, Mr. H.J. Dhedia, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State

Bhimrao Shripat Khandare

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and attempt to murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment and seven years rigorous imprisonment

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant on 19.12.2003 in Sessions Case No.1144 of 2000

Issues

Whether the extra-judicial confession made by the appellant is voluntary and reliable? Whether the dying declaration of the injured daughter is admissible and credible?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the extra-judicial confession was not voluntary and the dying declaration was unreliable. State argued that the evidence was consistent and sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The extra-judicial confession made by the appellant to the police constable, coupled with the dying declaration of the injured daughter, established the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The confession was voluntary and the dying declaration was admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The said person told the complainant and his colleague that he assaulted his wife and daughter with an axe. The injured girl disclosed her name as Rama and her mother's name as Lata and also disclosed the name of her father as Bhimrao, the appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge on 19.12.2003 in Sessions Case No.1144 of 2000. He appealed to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, which heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 23.11.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Axe Attack Case — Appellant's Guilt Established by Extra-Judicial Confession and Dying Declaration
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores FIR in Bribery Case Quashed by Karnataka High Court. The Supreme Court overrules Karnataka High Court’s decision, reinstating the FIR against the accused police officers in a bribery case linked to a corruption complaint.