Bombay High Court Adjourns Criminal Appeal Due to Related Appeal by Absconding Accused - Registry Directed to Prepare Paper Book. The court consolidated two appeals arising from the same crime for final hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 183
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench was hearing Criminal Appeal No. 712/2004 filed by Surjit Fulchand Khandke and another against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the learned APP pointed out that Criminal Appeal No. 412/2006, arising from the same crime, had been preferred by two accused who were absconding. In view of this, the court adjourned the hearing of the present appeal. The registry was directed to prepare the paper book in Criminal Appeal No. 412/2006 within eight weeks. Both appeals were ordered to be placed on the Final Hearing Board in the week commencing from 28.06.2010. The order was passed by a division bench comprising Justice A.P. Lavande and Justice R.K. Deshpande.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Adjournment of Appeal - Related Appeal by Absconding Accused - The court adjourned the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 712/2004 as another appeal (Cri. A. No. 412/2006) arising from the same crime was preferred by two absconding accused - The court directed the registry to prepare the paper book in the related appeal and listed both appeals for final hearing together (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be heard together with a related appeal filed by absconding accused arising from the same crime.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 712/2004 is adjourned. Registry directed to prepare paper book in Cri. A. No. 412/2006 within eight weeks. Both appeals to be placed on Final Hearing Board in the week commencing from 28.06.2010.

Law Points

  • Adjournment of appeal
  • Absconding accused
  • Consolidation of appeals
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (10) 172

Criminal Appeal No. 712/2004

2010-04-27

A. P. Lavande, R. K. Deshpande

Surjit Fulchand Khandke and anr.

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction or order in a criminal case.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought hearing of their appeal.

Filing Reason

Appeal against a decision in a criminal case.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be heard together with a related appeal filed by absconding accused arising from the same crime.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned APP pointed out that Cri. A. No. 412/2006 has been preferred by two accused, who are absconding, and arises from the same crime.

Ratio Decidendi

When a related appeal filed by absconding accused arises from the same crime, it is appropriate to adjourn the present appeal and consolidate both for final hearing.

Judgment Excerpts

Mr. Mirza, the learned A.P.P. pointed out that Cri. A. No.412/2006 has been preferred by two accused, who are absconding and the said appeal also arises from same crime from which the Cri. A. No. 712/2004 arises. Registry is directed to prepare paper book in Cri. A. No. 412/2006 within a period of eight weeks. Place this appeal along with Cri. A. No. 412/2006 on Final Hearing Board in the week commencing from 28.06.2010.

Procedural History

The case was listed before the division bench. The learned APP brought to the court's notice that another appeal (Cri. A. No. 412/2006) arising from the same crime was filed by two absconding accused. The court adjourned the hearing and directed consolidation.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Kotwals' Writ Petition Against Age Bar; Applies COVID-19 Relaxation GR to Group D Absorption. The Court Found That Government Resolution Dated 17.12.2021 Should Be Interpreted Liberally to Include All Kotwals Affected by Recru...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's CBI Investigation Direction in Bail Application Due to Jurisdictional Overreach. High Court Exceeded Limits Under Section 439 CrPC by Issuing CBI Directions After Granting Bail, Without Exceptional Circumstances Req...