Supreme Court Allows Additional Appellant in Civil Procedure Case — Ensures Rights of Transferee. The court held that the transferee of a property has the right to continue an appeal filed by the transferor under Section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against an order of the Calcutta High Court which dismissed the appellant's application to be brought on record as an additional appellant in a pending appeal concerning a mortgage decree. The appellant had purchased properties from the second respondent, who had previously mortgaged them to the first respondent. The first respondent had delayed execution of the decree for nearly 18 years, prompting the appellant to seek intervention to protect her rights. The High Court dismissed her application, leading to the present appeal. The core legal issue was whether the appellant could be added as an additional appellant under the Code of Civil Procedure. The court analyzed the provisions of Order 22, Rule 10, and Section 146 of the Code, concluding that the appellant was entitled to continue the appeal as she claimed under the transferor. The court emphasized the importance of allowing the appellant to protect her interests, especially given the substantial questions of law regarding the execution of the decree and the amount payable. Ultimately, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appellant to be brought on record as an additional appellant, ensuring her rights were safeguarded in the ongoing proceedings.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Addition of Party - Right of Transferee - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 146 - The appellant sought to be added as an additional appellant in a pending appeal after purchasing properties free of encumbrances. The court held that the application was maintainable under Section 146, allowing the transferee to continue the appeal initiated by the transferor. (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant could be brought on record as an additional appellant in the pending appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the order of the Calcutta High Court and directed that the appellant be brought on record as an additional appellant in Appeal No. 152 of 1955.

Law Points

  • Civil Procedure
  • Addition of party
  • Transfer pendente lite
  • Right of transferee to continue appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 350 of 1957

1958-02-14

S. R. Das C.J., Venkatarama Aiyar, A. K. Sarkar, Vivian Bose JJ.

N. C. Chatterjee, P. K. Mukherjee, B. Sen, P. K. Ghosh

SM. SAILA BALA DASSI

SM. NIRMALA SUNDARI DASSI AND ANOTHER

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal concerning the addition of a party in a mortgage decree execution case.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to be brought on record as an additional appellant.

Filing Reason

The appellant feared collusion between the respondents that could defeat her rights.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the appellant's application to be added as an additional appellant.

Issues

Whether the appellant could be added as an additional appellant in the pending appeal. Whether the application was maintainable under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that her application was maintainable under Section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The respondents contended that the application was not maintainable as it did not comply with Order 22, Rule 10.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a transferee has the right to continue an appeal filed by the transferor under Section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing the need to protect the rights of the transferee in ongoing legal proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

Held, that the application could not be sustained under 0. 22, r. 10, of the Code of Civil Procedure because... The application, however, falls within s. 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the appellant is entitled to be brought on record...

Procedural History

The appellant's application to be added as an additional appellant was dismissed by the Calcutta High Court on August 6, 1956, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 146, Order 22, Rule 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order on Shareholding and Valuation. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's order restoring the Appellant's shareholding and directed compliance with the buyout of shares.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Interim Order Restraining Filing of Charge-Sheet in Property Dispute Case. The Court held that the High Court cannot restrain filing of charge-sheet under Section 193(3) BNSS while a quashment petition is pending...