Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case, Modifies Interest Rate. Interest on compensation awarded from date of application at 12% per annum instead of 7% from date of order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 19
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, being the widow, minor children, and mother of the deceased Arvindkumar Bhimjiyani, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal for compensation arising from a railway accident. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 4 lacs with interest at 7% per annum from the date of its order (8.4.2009) till realization. The appellants appealed, seeking modification to award interest at 12% per annum from the date of application (26.6.2005) till realization. The High Court, relying on the precedent in Tahazhathe Purayil v. Union of India (2009 ACJ 2444), held that the issue was no longer res integra. The court noted that the Tribunal had erred in awarding interest only from the date of order instead of from the date of application. The court modified the Tribunal's order, directing that interest at 12% per annum be paid from the date of application (26.6.2005) till realization, with the amount of compensation already paid to be deducted. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Railway Law - Compensation - Interest - Section 13 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - The Tribunal awarded interest at 7% per annum from date of order. The High Court modified it to 12% per annum from date of application, following the principle that interest should be compensatory and not penal, and relying on precedent in Tahazhathe Purayil v. Union of India (2009 ACJ 2444). (Paras 2-4)

B) Civil Procedure - Interest - Section 34 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court held that interest on compensation should be awarded from the date of filing of the application, not from the date of the order, to compensate the claimant for the delay in payment. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Railway Claims Tribunal was correct in awarding interest on compensation from the date of its order (8.4.2009) at 7% per annum, or whether interest should be awarded from the date of application (26.6.2005) at 12% per annum.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order of the Railway Claims Tribunal is modified to the extent that the appellants are entitled to interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the compensation amount of Rs. 4 lacs from the date of application i.e. 26.6.2005 till realization. The amount of compensation already paid shall be deducted.

Law Points

  • Interest on compensation under Railway Claims Tribunal Act
  • 1987 should be awarded from date of application
  • not from date of order
  • rate of interest should be 12% per annum as per Section 34 of CPC and Section 3(3)(c) of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act
  • 1987.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (07) 163

First Appeal No. 251 of 2010

2010-07-12

A.P. Bhangale, J

A.J. Thakkar for appellants, N.P. Lambat for respondent

Smt Anjali wd/o Arvindkumar Bhimjiyani and others

Union of India, representing Railway Administration, through General Manager, Central Railway, CST, Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Railway Claims Tribunal awarding interest on compensation from date of order instead of date of application.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought modification of Tribunal's order to award interest at 12% per annum from date of application (26.6.2005) till realization.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal awarded interest at 7% per annum from date of order (8.4.2009) instead of from date of application.

Previous Decisions

Railway Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 4 lacs with interest at 7% per annum from 8.4.2009 till realization.

Issues

Whether interest on compensation should be awarded from date of application or date of order. What should be the rate of interest on compensation awarded by Railway Claims Tribunal.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that interest should be awarded at 12% per annum from date of application (26.6.2005) till realization. Respondent's arguments not mentioned in judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest on compensation should be awarded from the date of application, not from the date of order, and at a rate of 12% per annum, following the principle that interest is compensatory and should cover the period of delay in payment.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue is no more res integra. In Tahazhathe Purayil and ors v. Union of India & anr reported in 2009 ACJ 2444, the Tribunal had awarded interest at 6.5 per cent per annum from the date of application. In the result, the appeal is allowed. The order of the Tribunal is modified to the extent that the appellants are entitled to interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the compensation amount of Rs. 4 lacs from the date of application i.e. 26.6.2005 till realization.

Procedural History

The Railway Claims Tribunal passed an order on 8.4.2009 awarding compensation of Rs. 4 lacs with interest at 7% per annum from that date. The appellants filed First Appeal No. 251 of 2010 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the interest part. The appeal was admitted and heard on 12.7.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987: Section 13
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case, Modifies Interest Rate. Interest on compensation awarded from date of application at 12% per annum instead of 7% from date of order.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Refusal of Technical Clearance for Construction in Settlement Zone — Conversion Sanad Not Required for Non-Agricultural Use in Settlement Zone Under Goa Land Use Regulations. The Court held that once property is zon...