Search Results for "fatal accident"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "fatal accident"

619 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 619 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Accident Insurance Claim for Heart Attack Following Motorcycle Fall — 'Outward, Violent and Visible Means' Includes External Trauma Triggering Internal Injury. The Court held that a fall from a motorcycle constitutes an accident caused by outward, violent and visible means, and the resulting heart attack is a bodily injury proximately caused by the accident under the accident benefit clauses of the LIC policies.

24 Apr 2019

The appellant, Smt. Alka Shukla, is the widow of the deceased insured who held three life insurance policies with the Life Insurance Corporation of In...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Case, Upholds 50:50 Contributory Negligence Apportionment. Both ST Bus and Truck Drivers Found Negligent Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

16 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident on 12.01.2007 when an ST bus (GJ-18-V-8903) driven rashly rammed into a stationary truck (GJ-7-X-6523) parked wi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Sep 2016

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Bus Driver's Negligence Established by Preponderance of Probabilities. Non-examination of Pillion Rider Not Fatal to Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Feb 2019

The case arises from a motor accident on 28 October 2011, when Sitaram, a senior government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle with a pillion rid...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court held that under Section 163A, the claimant need not prove negligence, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground that the offending vehicle was not identified.

12 Jan 2026

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the wife, major children, and parents of the deceased Shantilal Kalabhai Garasia, a Poli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

6 Jan 2022

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case, Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal. Court sets aside finding of contributory negligence and applies correct multiplier and future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

19 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.06.2018, when the deceased, Suresh, was riding a motorcycle and was hit by a car driven by t...

High Court

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Applies Multiplier Method and Adds Future Prospects for Self-Employed Victim. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier 13 instead of 18 for a 25-year-old deceased and in not adding future prospects, thereby enhancing compensation from Rs.18,15,000 to Rs.19,64,400 under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2026

The case arises from a fatal motor accident that occurred on 22.10.2017, when the deceased, K. Ravichandran, aged 25 years, a bachelor, died in a road...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

29 Nov 2021

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 3,50,000 for Death of 24-Year-Old Bachelor. Multiplier of 18 applied and 50% deduction for personal expenses upheld as per legal principles.

19 Nov 2010

The appeal challenges the judgment and award dated 10.5.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mapusa in Claim Petition No. 40/2002. The...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)