Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Appointment and Expedited Scrutiny of Tribe Claim in Police Constable Recruitment Case. Petitioner's claim for provisional appointment as Police Constable pending verification of Scheduled Tribe certificate was upheld, with directions to the Superintendent of Police and Scrutiny Committee to act within stipulated time.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions. In Writ Petition No. 3482 of 2010, the petitioner, Gopal Mahadeorao Bayaskar, sought a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Akola, to issue a provisional appointment order as Police Constable pursuant to his selection from the Scheduled Tribe category, and to the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati, to decide the verification of his tribe claim as 'Thakur' within a stipulated period. The petitioner also sought interim relief to prevent cancellation of his name from the select list. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, issued rule returnable forthwith and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for provisional appointment in accordance with the Government Circular dated 30/08/2006 and to expedite the scrutiny process. The second petition, Writ Petition No. 2099 of 2010, was filed by the Maharashtra State Gazetted Veterinarians Association Gadchiroli Branch, but the judgment does not provide details of its disposal. The court, comprising Justices S.A. Bobde and A.B. Chaudhari, delivered the oral judgment on July 30, 2010, directing the respondents to act on the petitioner's representation.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Provisional Appointment - Petitioner selected as Police Constable in Scheduled Tribe category sought provisional appointment pending verification of his tribe claim as 'Thakur' - Court directed the Superintendent of Police to issue provisional appointment order and the Scrutiny Committee to decide the verification within stipulated period - Held that provisional appointment is warranted to protect the candidate's interest pending scrutiny (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to provisional appointment as Police Constable pending verification of his Scheduled Tribe claim by the Scrutiny Committee.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Rule made returnable forthwith. Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for provisional appointment in accordance with the Government Circular dated 30/08/2006 and to expedite the scrutiny process.

Law Points

  • Provisional appointment pending verification of caste claim
  • Scheduled Tribe certificate scrutiny
  • Government Circular dated 30/08/2006
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (07) 140

Writ Petition Nos. 3482 of 2010 & 2099 of 2010

2010-07-30

S.A. Bobde, A.B. Chaudhari

Mr. A.P. Kalmegh for petitioner, Mr. N.W. Sambre for respondents

Gopal Mahadeorao Bayaskar

State of Maharashtra, Superintendent of Police, Akola, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction for provisional appointment and verification of tribe claim.

Remedy Sought

Direction to Superintendent of Police to issue provisional appointment order and to Scrutiny Committee to decide verification of tribe claim.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was selected as Police Constable in Scheduled Tribe category but not given provisional appointment pending verification of his tribe claim.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to provisional appointment pending verification of his Scheduled Tribe claim.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for provisional appointment as per Government Circular dated 30/08/2006. Respondents opposed but court directed consideration.

Ratio Decidendi

A candidate selected in a reserved category is entitled to provisional appointment pending verification of caste claim, subject to the outcome of scrutiny by the competent committee.

Judgment Excerpts

The main relief prayed for by the petitioner is for the relief... Rule returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties by consent.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed in 2010; heard and disposed of on July 30, 2010.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Appointment and Expedited Scrutiny of Tribe Claim in Police Constable Recruitment Case. Petitioner's claim for provisional appointment as Police Constable pending verification of Scheduled Tribe certificate was u...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Recruitment Dispute Over Local Reservation Ratio Under Article 371D of Constitution. Court Restores Selection of Non-Local Candidate as Per 30:70 Ratio Under GOMs No. 124 Dated 07.03.2002.