Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Communication Regarding Implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report for Co-operative Societies. No Legal Right Found to Be Infringed by Administrative Directive on Cadre Restructuring Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dharangaon Taluka Dekhrekh Sahakari Sangh Limited, a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and a supervising unit for the cadre of Secretaries constituted under Section 69-A of the Act, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 07/12/2009 issued by the Commissioner for Co-operation and the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune, addressed to the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jalgaon, regarding the implementation of the Vaidyanathan Committee Report. The petitioner contended that the communication was illegal and without authority. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri V.D. Hon, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader, Shri S.K. Kadam, for the respondents. After considering the submissions, the court found that the communication did not violate any legal right of the petitioner and dismissed the petition. The judgment was delivered by a division bench of Justices P.V. Hardas and S.V. Gangapurwala, with the oral judgment authored by Justice S.V. Gangapurwala. The court did not elaborate on the specific contents of the Vaidyanathan Committee Report or the details of the communication, but concluded that the challenge was without merit.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Vaidyanathan Committee Report - Implementation - Communication dated 07/12/2009 - The petitioner, a supervising unit under Section 69-A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged the communication directing implementation of the Vaidyanathan Committee Report. The court held that the communication does not violate any legal right of the petitioner and dismissed the petition. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the communication dated 07/12/2009 regarding implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report is illegal and violative of the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report
  • No legal right to challenge administrative communication
  • Co-operative societies' cadre restructuring
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (04) 15

Writ Petition No. 1453 of 2010

2010-04-26

P.V. Hardas, S.V. Gangapurwala

V.D. Hon for Petitioner, S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4

Dharangaon Taluka Dekhrekh Sahakari Sangh Limited, Dharangaon, Through its Chairman Gokulsingh S/o Pralhad Patil

The State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner for Co-operation and the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, The District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jalgaon, The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies Dharangaon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a communication regarding implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the communication dated 07/12/2009 issued by the Commissioner for Co-operation and the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed the communication was illegal and without authority.

Issues

Whether the communication dated 07/12/2009 regarding implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report is illegal and violative of the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the communication was illegal and without authority. Respondents argued that the communication did not violate any legal right of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The communication dated 07/12/2009 regarding implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report does not violate any legal right of the petitioner, hence the petition is dismissed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner in present Writ Petition, impugns communication dated 07/12/2009 issued by the Commissioner for Co-operation and the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, M.S., Pune addressed to District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, regarding implementing Vaidyanathan Committee Report.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1453 of 2010 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the communication dated 07/12/2009. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 13th April 2010, pronouncing it on 26th April 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 69-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Communication Regarding Implementation of Vaidyanathan Committee Report for Co-operative Societies. No Legal Right Found to Be Infringed by Administrative Directive on Cadre Restructuring Under Ma...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Mob Damage Claim — National Commission's Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. The Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the National Commissi...