Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Section 11AC Held Prospective. Penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be imposed for period prior to 28.9.1996 even if show cause notice issued after that date.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 28th April, 2004 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai. The appeal was admitted on 29th September, 2005 to consider the substantial question of law: whether the provisions of Section 11AC are applicable to cases where show cause notice is issued subsequent to the enforcement of Section 11AC (i.e., 28.9.1996) even though the period of dispute is prior to that date. Section 11AC was introduced by Act 33 of 1996 with effect from 28th September, 1996. In this case, the show cause notice was issued on 12th June, 1998 for a period prior to 28.9.1996. The Tribunal had held that Section 11AC could not be applied retrospectively. The High Court, after hearing the parties, dismissed the appeal, holding that Section 11AC is prospective in nature and cannot be applied to periods prior to its enforcement, even if the show cause notice was issued after the enforcement date. The court reasoned that penal provisions cannot be given retrospective effect unless expressly stated or necessarily implied. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Penalty - Section 11AC - Retrospectivity - Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can be imposed for a period prior to its enforcement (28.9.1996) when show cause notice is issued after that date - Held that Section 11AC is prospective and cannot be applied to periods prior to its enforcement, as it creates a new penal liability and cannot be retrospective in the absence of express language or necessary implication (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are applicable to cases where show cause notice is issued subsequent to the enforcement of provisions of section 11AC i.e. 28.9.1996 even though the period of dispute is prior to 28.9.1996?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Penal provisions cannot be applied retrospectively
  • Section 11AC of Central Excise Act
  • 1944 is prospective in operation
  • Show cause notice issued after enforcement date does not attract penalty for prior period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 55

Central Excise Appeal No. 110 of 2004

2010-03-12

V.C.Daga, K.K.Tated

R.B.Pardeshi for the appellant, Madhur Baya for the respondent

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V, Mumbai

M/s.Otis Elevator Co.(I) Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against order of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to impose penalty under Section 11AC for period prior to its enforcement

Filing Reason

Dispute over applicability of Section 11AC penalty for period prior to 28.9.1996 when show cause notice issued after that date

Previous Decisions

Tribunal held Section 11AC not applicable retrospectively

Issues

Whether Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to periods prior to its enforcement (28.9.1996) if show cause notice is issued after that date

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that since show cause notice was issued after enforcement of Section 11AC, penalty should apply Respondent argued that Section 11AC is prospective and cannot apply to period prior to its enforcement

Ratio Decidendi

Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is prospective in operation and cannot be applied to periods prior to its enforcement (28.9.1996), even if the show cause notice is issued after that date, as penal provisions cannot be given retrospective effect without express language or necessary implication.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 11AC of the Act is brought on the statute book for the first time by the Act of 33 of 1996 with effect from 28th September, 1996. The show cause notice was issued on 12th June, 1998 for the period prior to the enforcement of Section 11AC.

Procedural History

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 28th April, 2004 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai. The appeal was admitted on 29th September, 2005 on the substantial question of law regarding applicability of Section 11AC. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 12th March, 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: 11AC, 35G
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Decree Declaring Sale Deed and Gift Deed Void in Property Dispute Involving KHB Lease-Cum-Sale Allotment. Court Examines Whether Subsequent Absolute Sale Deed by Housing Board Enures to Benefit of Tran...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Section 11AC Held Prospective. Penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be imposed for period prior to 28.9.1996 even if show cause notice issued after...