Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Detention of Second Hand Machinery Import — Circular No.4/2008-Cus Held Ultra Vires Section 14(1) of Customs Act, 1962. Transaction Value Must Be Accepted Unless Rebutted by Proper Evidence; Guidelines in Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s Bosch Limited (formerly Motor Industries Co. Ltd.), a public limited company engaged in manufacturing automotive components, imported a second hand machinery and filed a bill of entry on 1st February 2010, declaring the invoice value for assessment under Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner submitted an examination report on 19th February 2010 certifying the declared value as fair based on physical condition, and also obtained a Chartered Engineer's clarification on 11th March 2010. Despite this, the Customs authorities did not clear the consignment, leading to heavy detention and demurrage charges. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to compel clearance based on transaction value and also challenged Circular No.4/2008-Cus dated 12th February 2008, which laid down guidelines for valuation of second hand machinery. The court held that the transaction value under Section 14(1) is the primary basis for valuation and cannot be rejected without valid evidence. The Circular was found to be ultra vires as it attempted to override the statutory provision. The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to clear the consignment based on the declared transaction value.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Valuation of Imported Goods - Transaction Value - Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 - The court held that the transaction value declared by the importer must be accepted unless there is evidence to doubt its correctness; the Customs Circular No.4/2008-Cus cannot override the statutory provision. (Paras 2-6)

B) Customs Law - Circulars - Validity - Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 - The court held that Circular No.4/2008-Cus laying down guidelines for valuation of second hand machinery is ultra vires the Customs Act as it seeks to substitute the statutory method of valuation with a non-statutory formula. (Paras 2-6)

C) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to clear the consignment based on the transaction value, as the detention was unjustified and caused heavy demurrage. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Customs authorities can reject the transaction value declared for second hand machinery and insist on a higher value based on a departmental circular, and whether Circular No.4/2008-Cus is ultra vires Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to clear the consignment based on the transaction value declared by the petitioner, and held Circular No.4/2008-Cus as ultra vires Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.

Law Points

  • Transaction value under Section 14(1) of Customs Act
  • 1962 is the primary basis for valuation
  • Customs Circular cannot override statutory provisions
  • second hand machinery valuation must be based on declared invoice value unless rebutted
  • detention without valid reason is arbitrary
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 30

WRIT PETITION NO.2115 OF 2010

2010-03-29

V.C.Daga, K.K.Tated

Mr. V. Sridharan with Mr.Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for petitioners, Mr.P.S.Jately for respondents

Mr.Bosch Limited (formerly known as Motor Industries Co.Ltd.)

The Union of India, The Commissioner of Customs (Export Promotion), The Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Central Board of Excise & Customs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct customs authorities to clear imported second hand machinery based on transaction value and challenging the validity of Circular No.4/2008-Cus.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to allow clearance of consignment covered by bill of entry dated 1st February 2010 by accepting transaction value under Section 14(1) of Customs Act, 1962, and also challenged Circular No.4/2008-Cus.

Filing Reason

Customs authorities detained the consignment of second hand machinery and did not accept the declared transaction value, causing heavy detention and demurrage charges.

Issues

Whether the transaction value declared by the importer for second hand machinery must be accepted under Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962? Whether Circular No.4/2008-Cus is ultra vires the Customs Act, 1962?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the transaction value is the correct basis for assessment and the Circular cannot override the statutory provision. Respondents argued based on the Circular that the declared value was not acceptable.

Ratio Decidendi

The transaction value under Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 is the primary basis for valuation of imported goods and cannot be rejected without valid evidence; a departmental circular cannot override the statutory provision.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents and their subordinates to allow clearance of the consignment covered by bill of entry dated 1st February, 2010 by accepting the transaction value as under Section 14(1) of the Customs Act,1962. Incidentally, the Circular No.4/2008-Cus dated 12th February, 2008 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India laying down certain guidelines regarding valuation practice of second hand machinery is also a subject matter of challenge in the petition.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a bill of entry on 1st February 2010 for import of second hand machinery. The customs authorities did not clear the consignment. The petitioner submitted examination report on 19th February 2010 and Chartered Engineer's clarification on 11th March 2010. The petitioner filed a writ petition on an unspecified date, which was heard and finally disposed of on 29th March 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 14(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Detention of Second Hand Machinery Import — Circular No.4/2008-Cus Held Ultra Vires Section 14(1) of Customs Act, 1962. Transaction Value Must Be Accepted Unless Rebutted by Proper Evidence; Guidel...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title Under Will; Adverse Possession Claim by Defendant Upheld.