High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Cooperative Society and Dismisses LPA of Borrowers, Holding That Certificate under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is Not Challengeable under Section 91 Dispute. Certificate Issued under Section 101 with Finality Cannot Be Assailed Before Cooperative Court; Only Revision under Section 154 with Pre-deposit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a mortgage loan advanced by a cooperative society to one Smt. Indumati Shamrao Bhokare, whose legal representatives are the appellants. Upon default, the society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and obtained a recovery certificate from the Assistant Registrar. The appellants initially filed a civil suit challenging the certificate as a nullity for violation of natural justice. During writ proceedings, the High Court set aside the certificate and remanded the matter for fresh hearing; the suit was withdrawn. After remand, the Assistant Registrar again issued a certificate after hearing all parties. The appellants then filed a dispute under Section 91 of the Act before the Cooperative Court, seeking a declaration that the certificate was void and an injunction against its execution. The Cooperative Court granted an ad interim injunction. The society challenged this by filing a writ petition, questioning the very jurisdiction of the Cooperative Court under Section 91 to entertain such a dispute. A Single Judge of the High Court allowed the society’s writ petition and held that a certificate issued under Section 101 cannot be challenged under Section 91; the appellants’ own writ petition was dismissed. Aggrieved, the appellants filed the present Letters Patent Appeals. The Division Bench examined the scheme of the Act, focusing on Section 101’s non-obstante clause overriding Sections 91, 93, and 98, and the finality and conclusiveness attached to the certificate by Section 101(3). The Court noted the elaborate inquiry procedure prescribed under Rules 86A-F, which incorporate principles of natural justice. It held that the Cooperative Court had no jurisdiction to entertain a dispute under Section 91 questioning the validity of a Section 101 certificate. The only available remedy was revision under Section 154, subject to pre-deposit of fifty percent of the dues under Section 154(2A). Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, upholding the Single Judge’s orders. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Recovery Certificate - Finality - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 101(3) - A certificate granted under Section 101 is final and conclusive proof of arrears due and is recoverable as arrears of land revenue; the provision overrides Sections 91, 93 and 98. Held that the cooperative court under Section 91 has no jurisdiction to entertain a dispute seeking to declare the certificate a nullity. (Paras 8, 9)

B) Natural Justice - Section 101 - Inquiry Procedure - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Even prior to 2007, principles of natural justice were read into Section 101; after 2007, Rule 86A-F prescribes an elaborate procedure with notice, hearing, and reasoned order. Held that the certificate is issued after quasi-judicial proceedings and cannot be challenged under Section 91. (Paras 3, 7)

C) Cooperative Societies - Jurisdiction - Ouster of Cooperative Court - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The non-obstante clause in Section 101 ousts the jurisdiction of the cooperative court under Section 91; the only remedy against a recovery certificate is revision under Section 154 subject to pre-deposit. Held that the Single Judge rightly held that the dispute under Section 91 was not maintainable. (Paras 8, 10-12)

D) Revision - Condition of Pre-deposit - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Section 154(2A) - A revision against a recovery certificate under Section 101 requires pre-deposit of fifty percent of the total recoverable dues. Held that this condition reflects legislative intent to ensure finality and prompt recovery. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 can be challenged by filing a dispute under Section 91 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Letters Patent Appeals are dismissed. The judgments of the Single Judge holding that a certificate under Section 101 cannot be challenged under Section 91 are affirmed. No costs.

Law Points

  • Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960 provides a summary recovery procedure as arrears of land revenue
  • certificate is final and conclusive
  • non-obstante clause overrides Sections 91
  • 93 and 98
  • dispute under Section 91 not maintainable to challenge certificate
  • remedy is revision under Section 154 with pre-deposit of 50% under Section 154(2A)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 12

Letters Patent Appeal No. 194 of 2009 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 195 of 2009

2010-03-11

A.P. Deshpande, N.D. Deshpande

Mr. S.D. Kulkarni, Mr. S.V. Advant, Mr. K.B. Chaudhary, Mr. C.V. Korhalkar

Shri Vijay Shamrao Bhokre, Shri Sanjay Shamrao Bhokre, Shri Satish Shamrao Bhokre

Shri Mumbadevi Jilla Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Kopargaon and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to validity of recovery certificate issued under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and maintainability of dispute under Section 91.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought declaration that the recovery certificate was a nullity and an injunction against its execution, filed as a dispute under Section 91.

Filing Reason

The society obtained a recovery certificate after remand; the appellants contended the certificate was issued without proper hearing and against principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

Civil suit filed earlier; trial court granted injunction and held civil court had jurisdiction. High Court set aside certificate and remanded for hearing; suit withdrawn. After remand, certificate re-issued. Cooperative Court granted ad interim injunction. Single Judge held Section 91 dispute not maintainable and allowed society's writ petition.

Issues

Whether a certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 can be challenged by way of a dispute under Section 91 of the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants contended that the certificate was a nullity as it was issued without following principles of natural justice, and a dispute under Section 91 was maintainable to declare it void. Respondent society contended that the Cooperative Court had no jurisdiction under Section 91 to entertain a challenge to a Section 101 certificate, given the non-obstante clause and the finality and conclusiveness of the certificate.

Ratio Decidendi

A certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, being final and conclusive and having overriding effect over Sections 91, 93 and 98, is not open to challenge by way of a dispute under Section 91 of the Act. The only remedy available is revision under Section 154, subject to pre-deposit under Section 154(2A).

Judgment Excerpts

Section 101 of the Act is a special provision for recovery of arrears due to certain Societies as arrears of land revenue. A certificate granted by the Registrar under sub-section (1) or (2) shall be final and a conclusive proof of the arrears stated to be due therein... No application for revision shall be entertained against the recovery certificate issued by the Registrar under section 101 unless the applicant deposits with the concerned society, fifty percent amount of the total amount of recoverable dues.

Procedural History

Smt. Indumati Shamrao Bhokare took mortgage loan from respondent society and defaulted. Society initiated proceedings under Section 101 and obtained recovery certificate. Legal representatives filed civil suit for declaration of nullity and injunction; trial court granted injunction. Society filed writ petition; High Court set aside certificate and remanded for hearing; suit withdrawn. After remand, Assistant Registrar again issued certificate. Appellants filed dispute under Section 91 before Cooperative Court; ad interim injunction granted. Society filed Writ Petition No. 2776/2009 questioning jurisdiction; Single Judge stayed proceedings. Appellants filed Writ Petition No. 3457/2009. Single Judge allowed society’s writ petition and dismissed appellants’ writ petition, holding Section 91 dispute not maintainable. Appellants filed Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 194/2009 and 195/2009. Division Bench dismissed appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 101, 91, 93, 98, 152, 154, 154(2A)
  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961: Rule 86A, 86B, 86C, 86D, 86E, 86F
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Assistant Professors Claiming Professor's Pay Scale Under Career Advancement Scheme — Nominal Designation as Associate Professor Without Substantive Appointment Does Not Entitle to Higher Pay Scale. The ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Cooperative Society and Dismisses LPA of Borrowers, Holding That Certificate under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is Not Challengeable under Section 91 ...