Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Beed to Gevrai in Matrimonial Dispute Involving Maintenance and Criminal Proceedings. Convenience of Wife with Minor Child Prioritized Over Husband's Objections Under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from marital discord between Tanhaji Bhaguji Shendge (husband) and Shivkanya Tanaji Shendge (wife). The wife initiated maintenance proceedings and a criminal prosecution under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code against the husband at Gevrai court. In response, the husband filed a divorce petition at Beed court. The wife then filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of the divorce petition from Beed to Gevrai for her convenience. The husband opposed the transfer, arguing that the wife had already filed multiple cases and that the transfer would cause him inconvenience. The court, after hearing both sides, noted that the wife had to travel from Chorpuri to Beed (about 40-50 km) with her minor child, while the husband could easily travel to Gevrai. The court held that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife should be given priority. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and transferred the divorce petition from the Family Court at Beed to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gevrai, for disposal. The court directed both parties to appear before the transferee court on 22nd February 2010.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Convenience of Wife - Husband filed divorce petition at Beed while wife's maintenance and criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC were pending at Gevrai - Court allowed transfer to Gevrai to avoid inconvenience to wife who had to travel with minor child - Held that convenience of wife should be considered in matrimonial matters (Para 4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition filed by the husband at Beed should be transferred to Gevrai where the wife's maintenance and criminal proceedings are pending, for the convenience of the wife.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. Hindu Marriage Petition No. 11/2009 pending before the Family Court, Beed is transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gevrai for disposal. Both parties directed to appear before the transferee court on 22nd February 2010.

Law Points

  • Transfer of matrimonial proceedings
  • convenience of parties
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Section 498A IPC
  • maintenance proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 236

Misc.Civil Application No.21 of 2009

2010-01-18

K. U. Chandiwal

Mr. Sachin Deshmukh for appellants, Mr. V. D. Saunke for respondent nos.1 and 2

Shivkanya W/o Tanaji Shendge and Ku. Chaya D/o Tanhaji Shendge (minor)

Tanhaji Bhaguji Shendge, Bhaguji Mahada Shendge, Parabai W/o Bhaguji Shendge, Maroti S/o Bhaguji Shendge

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for transfer of divorce petition from Family Court at Beed to Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gevrai.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of divorce petition (Hindu Marriage Petition No. 11/2009) from Family Court, Beed to Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gevrai.

Filing Reason

Wife sought transfer of divorce petition filed by husband at Beed to Gevrai where her maintenance and criminal proceedings were pending, to avoid inconvenience of traveling with minor child.

Issues

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from Beed to Gevrai for the convenience of the wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant/wife argued that she has to travel from Chorpuri to Beed (40-50 km) with her minor child, while her maintenance and criminal cases are at Gevrai, causing inconvenience. Respondent/husband opposed transfer, stating that the wife has already filed multiple cases and transfer would cause him inconvenience.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife should be given priority, especially when she has to travel with a minor child and has other proceedings pending at the transferee court.

Judgment Excerpts

In matrimonial matters, convenience of the wife is to be considered. The wife has to travel from Chorpuri to Beed with her minor child, which is inconvenient.

Procedural History

Wife filed maintenance proceedings and criminal case under Section 498A IPC at Gevrai. Husband filed divorce petition at Beed. Wife then filed this application under Section 24 CPC for transfer of divorce petition to Gevrai.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Claimant's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced to Rs. 2/- per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Sales and Potentiality for Non-Agricultural Use. The court held that the Reference Court erred in not applying th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Beed to Gevrai in Matrimonial Dispute Involving Maintenance and Criminal Proceedings. Convenience of Wife with Minor Child Prioritized Over Husband's Objections Under Section 24 CPC.