High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Death of 7-Year-Old Child in Motor Accident — Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 Per Annum Applied with Multiplier of 15 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Parents of Deceased Child Awarded Rs. 2,25,000 with 6% Interest.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of Fareenbee, a 7-year-old girl studying in 2nd class, who lost her life in a road accident. The parents sought compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, after evaluating evidence, awarded Rs.75,000 with interest at 6% per annum. Dissatisfied with the quantum, the parents appealed to the High Court. The core legal issue was whether the compensation was just and proper. The appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in not applying the multiplier method and notional income as per the Second Schedule. The respondent, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, supported the Tribunal's award. The High Court, relying on Section 163A and the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, held that for a child aged 7 years, the notional income should be taken as Rs.15,000 per annum and the multiplier should be 15. Accordingly, the compensation was calculated as Rs.15,000 x 15 = Rs.2,25,000. The Court also awarded interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition. The appeal was allowed, enhancing the compensation from Rs.75,000 to Rs.2,25,000.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Child Death - Notional Income - Multiplier - The Tribunal awarded Rs.75,000 with 6% interest for death of a 7-year-old child. On appeal, the High Court held that as per Section 163A and Schedule II of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the notional income for a non-earning child should be taken as Rs.15,000 per annum, and the appropriate multiplier is 15, resulting in a total compensation of Rs.2,25,000 with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition. (Paras 1-5)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Interest Rate - The High Court maintained the interest rate of 6% per annum as awarded by the Tribunal, noting that it is reasonable. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the death of a 7-year-old child was just and proper, and what should be the appropriate multiplier and notional income.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The compensation is enhanced from Rs.75,000 to Rs.2,25,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition till realization. The respondent is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Compensation for death of child
  • notional income
  • multiplier method
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Section 163A
  • Schedule II
  • fatal accident
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 218

First Appeal No.1398 of 2009

2010-01-05

K. U. Chandiwala

Mr. P.S. Agrawal for appellants, Mr. A. D. Wange for respondent

Shaikh Mujeeb S/o Shaikh Majeed and Lailabee w/o Shaikh Mujeeb

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation for the death of a child in a motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Filing Reason

The appellants, parents of the deceased child, were dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation of Rs.75,000 awarded by the Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by order dated 17th March 2009, awarded Rs.75,000 with interest at 6% p.a.

Issues

Whether the compensation of Rs.75,000 awarded by the Tribunal for the death of a 7-year-old child is just and proper. What should be the appropriate notional income and multiplier for computing compensation in case of death of a child?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in not applying the multiplier method and notional income as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act. Respondent supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

In case of death of a child, the notional income should be taken as Rs.15,000 per annum as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the appropriate multiplier is 15. The compensation is computed as Rs.15,000 x 15 = Rs.2,25,000.

Judgment Excerpts

In the accident, Fareenbee, aged 7 years, studying in 2nd class, lost her precious life. The learned Member, on evaluation of evidence, by an order dated 17th March, 2009, assessed same to the tune of Rs.75,000/ with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. In the case of death of a child, the notional income is Rs.15,000/ per annum and the multiplier is 15. Thus, the compensation works out to Rs.2,25,000/.

Procedural History

The appellants filed Motor Accident Claim Petition No.288/2005 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Tribunal awarded Rs.75,000 with 6% interest on 17th March 2009. Aggrieved, the appellants filed the present First Appeal before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 163A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Death of 7-Year-Old Child in Motor Accident — Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 Per Annum Applied with Multiplier of 15 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Parents of Deceased Child Awarded Rs. 2,25,000 with 6...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Development Charges Demand by Nagpur Improvement Trust on Transferee of Regularized Plot. NIT Lacks Competency to Impose Additional Charges After Regularization Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Act, 2001.