Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under Section 498-A IPC in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement and Divorce by Mutual Consent. Court Relies on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana to Exercise Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC to Quash Cases Where Parties Have Settled and No Longer Wish to Prosecute.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants (husband and his relatives) filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging criminal cases pending against them in the trial court. The cases arose from a complaint filed by respondent No.2 (wife) under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (cruelty by husband or relatives). During the pendency of the application, the parties filed a joint affidavit stating that they had settled the dispute and were no longer willing to prosecute each other. The wife appeared before the court and confirmed the correctness of the affidavit, stating she did not wish to continue the prosecution. The marriage had already been dissolved by mutual consent by a competent Family Court. The court, relying on the Supreme Court decision in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana (AIR 2003 SC 1386), held that this was a fit case to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings. The court allowed the application, made the rule absolute in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B), and ordered no costs.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC - Matrimonial Dispute - Parties settled dispute and marriage dissolved by mutual consent - Wife stated she was not willing to prosecute complaint under Section 498-A IPC - Court quashed proceedings relying on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana - Held that inherent powers can be exercised to quash proceedings in matrimonial cases where settlement is genuine and parties want to buy peace (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between the parties, especially after dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Criminal Application allowed. Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes where parties have settled and marriage is dissolved by mutual consent
  • following B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 108

Criminal Application No.3597/2009

2010-01-04

A.B. Chaudhari, J.

Shri R.M. Daga for applicants, Shri A.S. Sonare APP for respondent No.1, Shri R.S. Renu for respondent No.2

Vincent s/o Anil Thorat, Anil s/o Jaywant Thorat, Jivan s/o Anil Thorat, Mrs. Lusi w/o Anil Thorat

The State of Maharashtra, Bhavna w/o Vincent Thorat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal cases pending in trial court under Section 498-A IPC.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought quashing of criminal cases mentioned in prayer clauses (A) and (B) of the application.

Filing Reason

Challenge to criminal cases pending between the parties in the trial court.

Previous Decisions

Marriage dissolved by mutual consent by competent Family Court; joint affidavit filed by parties stating settlement.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between the parties, especially after dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.

Submissions/Arguments

Joint affidavit by parties stating settlement and no willingness to prosecute; wife confirmed before court; APP had no objection.

Ratio Decidendi

Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes where parties have genuinely settled the dispute and the marriage has been dissolved by mutual consent, as held in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana.

Judgment Excerpts

In the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of B.S. Joshi and others...Versus...State of Haryana and another, reported at AIR 2003 Supreme Court 1386 I find that this is a fit case where power to quash the proceedings under the inherent powers should be exercised.

Procedural History

Criminal Application No.3597/2009 filed before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench challenging criminal cases pending in trial court. During pendency, joint affidavit filed by parties stating settlement. Court heard parties and passed order on 04.01.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 498-A
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under Section 498-A IPC in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement and Divorce by Mutual Consent. Court Relies on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana to Exercise Inherent Powers Under Section 482 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CAT Order Denying Promotion from 2010. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 22 November 2010 rejected as he was not eligible on that date.