Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Prisoners in Ongoing Trial, Directs Expedited Completion Within Four Months. Court declines bail as trial is near conclusion and directs trial court to complete proceedings expeditiously.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Omprakash Bharat Bhatkar and Sanjay Chandrakant Patharkar, were prisoners in Wardha District Prison and filed Criminal Application No. 3535 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking bail. The respondent was the Superintendent of Wardha District Prison. The court heard the matter on 7th January 2010, with Mr. A.A. Sambharey as appointed counsel for the applicants and Mr. A.S. Sonare as the Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. The learned APP stated that the Investigating Officer had been examined and the prosecution had almost completed its evidence, indicating that the trial was likely to conclude soon. The court, therefore, rejected the bail request but directed the trial judge to complete the trial and render judgment within four months from receipt of the court's order. The court also ordered that the applicants be informed of the decision and that the appointed counsel be paid Rs.750 as fees.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Rejection - Trial Near Completion - The applicants sought bail during trial. The court rejected bail noting that the prosecution had almost completed its evidence and the trial was likely to conclude soon. The court directed the trial judge to complete the trial and deliver judgment within four months. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial when the trial is almost complete.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail rejected. Trial court directed to complete trial and render judgment within four months from receipt of writ. Applicants to be informed. Appointed counsel to be paid Rs.750 as fees.

Law Points

  • Bail rejection
  • expedited trial
  • completion of evidence
  • direction to trial court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 47

Criminal Application No. 3535 of 2009

2010-01-07

A.B. Chaudhari

Mr. A.A. Sambharey (for applicants), Mr. A.S. Sonare (APP for respondent)

Omprakash Bharat Bhatkar and Sanjay Chandrakant Patharkar

The Superintendent, Wardha District Prison, Wardha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for bail pending trial.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought grant of bail.

Filing Reason

Applicants were in prison and sought bail during trial.

Issues

Whether bail should be granted when trial is almost complete.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned APP stated that Investigating Officer has been examined and prosecution has almost completed its evidence, indicating likelihood of decision of trial itself.

Ratio Decidendi

Bail may be rejected when trial is near completion and there is likelihood of early decision, to avoid prolonging incarceration unnecessarily while ensuring expeditious conclusion.

Judgment Excerpts

There is likelihood of the decision of the trial itself. Request for grant of bail made by the applicants in this application is rejected.

Procedural History

Applicants filed Criminal Application No. 3535 of 2009 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench seeking bail. The court heard the matter on 7th January 2010 and passed the order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Bhusawal to New Delhi on Grounds of Convenience. The Court directed expeditious disposal within two years and appearance of parties on 24th January 2022.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Prisoners in Ongoing Trial, Directs Expedited Completion Within Four Months. Court declines bail as trial is near conclusion and directs trial court to complete proceedings expeditiously.