Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Wife Over Refusal to Cook Scrambled Eggs. Dying declaration made to landlord and circumstantial evidence including bloodstained clothes and knife held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Subhash Ramji Kumbhar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of his wife Vaishali under Section 302 IPC and for criminal intimidation under Section 504 IPC, and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 4 August 2013 when the deceased had cooked food but the appellant insisted on scrambled eggs; upon her refusal, he abused her and stabbed her in the stomach with a kitchen knife. The landlord (PW-1) and his son (PW-4) took the deceased to hospital, during which she narrated the incident to PW-1; she died on arrival. The appellant was present at the spot with bloodstained clothes and was detained by neighbours. The prosecution examined 9 witnesses, including the landlord, neighbour, and medical officer. The appellant's defence was that he was falsely implicated. The High Court, after analyzing the evidence, held that the dying declaration made to PW-1 was credible and corroborated by the medical evidence (stab wound) and the recovery of the bloodstained knife and clothes. The court found no reason to disbelieve the prosecution's case and upheld the conviction and sentence, dismissing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302, 504 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The deceased's statement to the landlord (PW-1) while being taken to hospital, attributing the stabbing to the appellant over a trivial domestic quarrel, was treated as a dying declaration. The court held that the dying declaration was voluntary, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence and the appellant's bloodstained clothes, thus sufficient to sustain conviction for murder. (Paras 2-3, 10-12)

B) Criminal Law - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant was found at the spot with bloodstained clothes, the knife was recovered, and the deceased died of a single stab wound. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the appellant, rejecting the defence of false implication. (Paras 5-9, 13-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable based on the dying declaration and circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 504 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Conviction upheld
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (10) 48

Criminal Appeal No. 744 of 2017

2020-10-06

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, N.J. Jamadar

2020:BHC-AS:7228-DB

Mr. Sushil Inamdar (for appellant), Ms. M.H. Mhatre (APP for State)

Subhash Ramji Kumbhar

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and criminal intimidation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 504 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for stabbing his wife to death over a trivial domestic quarrel.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 24/4/2017 in Sessions Case No. 936 of 2013.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration made to PW-1 is reliable and sufficient to convict the appellant. Whether the circumstantial evidence, including bloodstained clothes and knife, completes the chain of guilt.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he was falsely implicated and the dying declaration was not reliable. Prosecution argued that the dying declaration was voluntary and corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration made to a credible witness, when consistent with medical evidence and circumstantial evidence, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant herein questions the Judgment and Order dated 24/4/2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 936 of 2013, thereby convicting the appellant for offence punishable under section 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon enquiry by P.W.1 Mr. Pawar, injured had disclosed that 'on that day in the afternoon, she had cooked food and requested her husband to have meals, but he was insisting upon her to cook scrambled eggs... the appellant had abused her and thereafter, he had taken knife lying on the kitchen platform and stabbed it into her stomach.'

Procedural History

FIR registered on 4/8/2013. Charge-sheet filed. Case committed to Sessions Court as Sessions Case No. 936 of 2013. Trial court convicted appellant on 24/4/2017. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 744 of 2017 in Bombay High Court. Appeal heard and dismissed on 6/10/2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 504
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revision Application of Commanding Officer, INS Hansa, Seeking Transfer of Criminal Case to Navy Court. The Court held that when naval personnel are accused of offences triable by court-martial, the criminal court m...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Wife Over Refusal to Cook Scrambled Eggs. Dying declaration made to landlord and circumstantial evidence including bloodstained clothes and knife held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302...