Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order in Cooperative Loan Recovery — Guarantor's Liability Upheld Despite Non-Impleadment of Borrower. Section 101 Certificate Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Cannot Be Set Aside in Revision Without Proper Notice to All Parties.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 128
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sunil Sitaram Mahajan, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.01.2015 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur Division. The impugned order allowed a revision application filed by respondent No.1, Suryakant Pandurang Badave, and set aside a notice of hearing dated 23.01.2014 issued in recovery proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The factual background involves respondent No.4 (Pooja Annaso Jadhav) as the borrower from respondent No.3, Shahu Corner Nagari Sahakari Path Sanstha Maryadit, with respondent No.1 acting as guarantor. Upon default, the society initiated certificate proceedings under Section 101, resulting in a certificate dated 01.06.2010 for Rs.11,09,258 with interest at 16% per annum from 01.10.2005. The society then filed an application for recovery, and a notice of hearing was issued on 23.01.2014. Respondent No.1 filed a revision before the Joint Registrar, who set aside the notice on the ground that the borrower was not impleaded as a party in the certificate proceedings. The High Court framed the legal issue: whether the revisional authority could set aside the notice on that ground. The petitioner argued that the society is entitled to proceed against the guarantor alone and that the borrower is not a necessary party. The respondent contended that the certificate proceedings were vitiated due to non-joinder. The court analyzed Section 101 and held that the Cooperative Court is not required to implead the borrower if the society chooses to recover only from the guarantor. The court found that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 154 by setting aside the notice without proper consideration. The High Court quashed the revision order and restored the notice of hearing, directing the Cooperative Court to proceed with the recovery application. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Recovery Proceedings - Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Certificate Proceedings - The court considered whether the absence of the borrower as a party in certificate proceedings under Section 101 vitiates the recovery certificate against the guarantor. Held that the society is entitled to proceed against the guarantor alone and the Cooperative Court is not required to implead the borrower if the society chooses to recover only from the guarantor. The revision order setting aside the notice of hearing was quashed. (Paras 4-8)

B) Cooperative Law - Revision - Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Scope of Revision - The court examined the scope of revisional powers under Section 154. Held that the revisional authority cannot set aside a notice of hearing without considering that the borrower was not a necessary party in the certificate proceedings against the guarantor. The revision was allowed erroneously. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, could in revision set aside a notice of hearing issued in recovery proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, on the ground that the borrower was not impleaded as a party in the certificate proceedings?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order dated 20.01.2015 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur Division, and restored the notice of hearing dated 23.01.2014. The Cooperative Court was directed to proceed with the recovery application in accordance with law. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Revision jurisdiction under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960 is limited and cannot be exercised to set aside a recovery certificate without notice to the society
  • Cooperative Court cannot be faulted for not impleading borrower when society chooses to proceed only against guarantor
  • Section 101 certificate is enforceable against guarantor even if borrower is not a party to recovery proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 60

WRIT PETITION NO.11417 OF 2015

2016-03-18

R.M. SAVANT

Mr. A. B. Borkar for the Petitioner, Mr. Tanaji Mhatugade for the Respondent No.1, Mrs. Vaishali S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 & 5

Shri. Sunil Sitaram Mahajan

Suryakant Pandurang Badave, District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur, Recovery Officer, Shahu Corner Nagari Sahakari Path Sanstha Maryadit, Sou. Pooja Annaso Jadhav, Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging revisional order under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 setting aside notice of hearing in recovery proceedings under Section 101.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (Recovery Officer of the society) sought quashing of the revision order dated 20.01.2015 and restoration of the notice of hearing dated 23.01.2014.

Filing Reason

The Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the revision application of the guarantor (respondent No.1) and set aside the notice of hearing on the ground that the borrower was not impleaded in the certificate proceedings.

Previous Decisions

Certificate under Section 101 was issued on 01.06.2010 for Rs.11,09,258 with interest. Notice of hearing dated 23.01.2014 was issued in recovery proceedings. The revision application filed by respondent No.1 was allowed by order dated 20.01.2015, setting aside the notice.

Issues

Whether the revisional authority under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 could set aside a notice of hearing in recovery proceedings under Section 101 on the ground that the borrower was not impleaded as a party in the certificate proceedings? Whether the Cooperative Court is required to implead the borrower when the society chooses to proceed only against the guarantor for recovery of the loan amount?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the society is entitled to proceed against the guarantor alone and the borrower is not a necessary party in certificate proceedings under Section 101. The revisional authority erred in setting aside the notice. Respondent No.1 contended that the certificate proceedings were vitiated because the borrower was not impleaded, and therefore the notice of hearing was rightly set aside.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, the society is entitled to proceed against the guarantor alone for recovery of the loan amount, and the Cooperative Court is not required to implead the borrower if the society chooses to recover only from the guarantor. The revisional authority under Section 154 cannot set aside a notice of hearing on the ground of non-joinder of the borrower.

Judgment Excerpts

The society is entitled to proceed against the guarantor alone and the Cooperative Court is not required to implead the borrower if the society chooses to recover only from the guarantor. The revisional authority has clearly erred in setting aside the notice of hearing on the ground that the borrower was not impleaded as a party in the certificate proceedings.

Procedural History

The society initiated certificate proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 against the guarantor (respondent No.1) after default by the borrower. A certificate was issued on 01.06.2010. The society filed a recovery application, and a notice of hearing was issued on 23.01.2014. Respondent No.1 filed a revision application under Section 154 before the Divisional Joint Registrar, who allowed it on 20.01.2015, setting aside the notice. The petitioner (Recovery Officer) filed the present writ petition challenging the revision order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 101, 154
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous Due to Company Dissolution Under Section 560(5) of Companies Act, 1956. High Court Failed to Consider Relevant Provisions of Companies Act and Income Tax Act Regarding Continuing Liabil...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Challenge to Attornment and Arrears of Rent Fails. Concurrent findings of fact regarding arrears of rent and forfeiture of tenancy under Sections 15 and 16...