Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Salary Release of Special Teacher in Deaf and Dumb School — State Directed to Pay Salary from Date of Appointment. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to salary for services rendered from 25th June, 2015, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Asha Krishnaji Kulkarni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release her salary for services rendered as a Special Teacher in the Deaf and Dumb School, Satara, with effect from 25th June, 2015. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra, the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, the Regional Deputy Commissioner Social Welfare, the District Social Welfare Officer, the Head-Mistress of the school, and the President of Samta Shikshak Mandal. The petitioner was appointed as a special teacher and had been rendering services but her salary was not paid from the date of appointment. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat, and the learned AGP for the respondent-State, Mr. V.M. Mali. The court considered the submissions and held that the petitioner is entitled to salary for the period she actually worked. The court directed the respondents to release the salary of the petitioner for the services rendered by her with effect from 25th June, 2015, within a period of eight weeks from the date of the order. The writ petition was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Rule was made absolute accordingly.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Salary for Services Rendered - The petitioner, appointed as a special teacher, sought direction to respondents to release salary from 25th June, 2015. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to salary for the period she actually worked, and directed the respondents to pay the same within a specified period. (Paras 1-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a special teacher appointed in a Deaf and Dumb School, is entitled to salary from the date of her appointment (25th June, 2015) for services rendered.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The respondents are directed to release the salary of the petitioner for the services rendered by her with effect from 25th June, 2015, within a period of eight weeks from today. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Right to Salary for Services Rendered
  • Social Justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 28

WRIT PETITION NO.1625 OF 2017

2020-08-05

S.S. SHINDE, V.G.BISHT

2020:BHC-AS:6943-DB

Mr.Pradeep J. Thorat for the Petitioner, Mr.V.M.Mali AGP for the Respondent-State

Asha Krishnaji Kulkarni

The State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, The Regional Dy.Commissioner Social Welfare, The District Social Welfare Officer, The Head-Mistress Deaf and Dumb School, The President Samta Shikshak Mandal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus for release of salary.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents to release salary for services rendered as Special Teacher from 25th June, 2015.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of salary to the petitioner for services rendered as a Special Teacher in the Deaf and Dumb School, Satara.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary from 25th June, 2015 for services rendered as a Special Teacher.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she rendered services as a Special Teacher but salary was not paid from the date of appointment. Respondent-State did not contest the claim substantially.

Ratio Decidendi

A person who has rendered services is entitled to salary for the period of actual work, and the State cannot withhold payment without justification.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Petitioner has approached this Court with following prayers : That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to release the Salary of the Petitioner for services rendered by the Petitioner of Special Teacher in the Deaf and Dumb School, Satara with effect from 25th June, 2015.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2017, heard on 6th March 2020, and judgment pronounced on 5th August 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Truck Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Contributory Negligence of Both Drivers Upheld. Injured passenger awarded Rs.1,35,000/- for amputation of both legs; owner's insurer absolved due to breach of policy condit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act for Want of Readiness and Willingness. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the plaintiff fa...