Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Wife's Abnormal Behaviour and False Criminal Complaint Constitute Mental Cruelty. Filing of false Section 498-A IPC case and persistent abnormal conduct held to be cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant husband married the respondent wife about 14 years before filing the divorce petition. They had two children: a son Pandurang born in 1991 and a daughter Deepali born in 1993. The husband alleged that the wife was quarrelsome, behaved abnormally, used to take off her clothes and tear his clothes, assaulted him, and abused his mother. She also filed a criminal case under Section 498-A IPC against the husband and his parents, which was later settled amicably leading to his acquittal. Despite resuming cohabitation after the settlement, her behaviour did not improve. The husband filed Hindu Marriage Petition No. 63/1999 seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. The trial court dismissed the petition. The husband appealed to the District Court, which also dismissed the appeal. In second appeal before the Bombay High Court, the court framed the substantial question of law whether the wife's conduct constituted cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The High Court held that the wife's abnormal behaviour, including taking off clothes, tearing clothes, assaulting the husband, abusing his mother, and filing a false criminal complaint, amounted to mental cruelty. The court noted that the wife did not appear to contest the appeal despite service. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgments of the lower courts, and granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce - Cruelty - Section 13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Mental Cruelty - Wife's abnormal behaviour including taking off clothes, tearing clothes, assaulting husband, abusing mother-in-law, and filing false criminal complaint under Section 498-A IPC - Held that such conduct amounts to mental cruelty entitling husband to divorce (Paras 2-3, 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the wife's abnormal behaviour and filing of a false criminal complaint under Section 498-A IPC constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, warranting dissolution of marriage.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Judgment and decree of the District Judge-2, Sangamner dated 23.06.2011 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 123/2011 and of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner dated 23.01.2001 in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 63/1999 are set aside. Marriage between appellant and respondent is dissolved by decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Law Points

  • Mental cruelty
  • false criminal complaint
  • abnormal behaviour
  • divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (02) 12

Second Appeal No. 503 of 2011

2021-02-18

M.G. Sewlikar, J.

Mr. S.T. Shelke for Appellant, Mr. Chaitanya Deshpande h/f Mr. C.R. Deshpande for Respondent

Sukhadev S/o Shantilal Tumbhare

Sou. Manda W/o Sukhadev Tumbhare

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against dismissal of divorce petition on ground of cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Remedy Sought

Appellant husband sought dissolution of marriage on ground of cruelty.

Filing Reason

Wife's abnormal behaviour, assault, abuse, and filing false criminal case under Section 498-A IPC.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed Hindu Marriage Petition No. 63/1999 on 23.01.2001; District Court dismissed Regular Civil Appeal No. 123/2011 on 23.06.2011.

Issues

Whether the wife's conduct, including abnormal behaviour and filing false criminal complaint, constitutes cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that wife's abnormal behaviour, assault, abuse, and false criminal case amounted to mental cruelty. Respondent did not appear to contest the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The wife's abnormal behaviour, including taking off clothes, tearing clothes, assaulting husband, abusing mother-in-law, and filing a false criminal complaint under Section 498-A IPC, constitutes mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, entitling the husband to divorce.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant filed the aforesaid petition for dissolution of marriage alleging that the respondent is a quarrelsome woman. She used to take off her clothes and tore the clothes of the appellant. This behaviour of the respondent was causing annoyance to the appellant.

Procedural History

Husband filed Hindu Marriage Petition No. 63/1999 before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner seeking divorce on ground of cruelty. Petition dismissed on 23.01.2001. Husband appealed to District Court, Sangamner in Regular Civil Appeal No. 123/2011, which was dismissed on 23.06.2011. Husband then filed Second Appeal No. 503/2011 before Bombay High Court, which was allowed on 18.02.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(ia)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 498-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Wife's Abnormal Behaviour and False Criminal Complaint Constitute Mental Cruelty. Filing of false Section 498-A IPC case and persistent abno...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Second Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in First Appeal — Finding of First Appellate Court Held Perverse. The Court set aside the order rejecting condonation of delay and restored the first appe...