Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Causal Link Between Assault and Death. The court upheld the acquittal of accused charged under Section 302 r/w Section 34 IPC as the prosecution failed to establish that the head injury causing death was inflicted during the alleged assault.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rameshwar s/o Kanhoba Chalak and Ramesh s/o Kishanrao Chalak (respondents/accused) in Sessions Case No.186/1999, where they were charged with murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case arose from an incident on 18.08.1999, when the deceased Munja Vishwanath More was allegedly assaulted by the accused with a cudgel, fists, and kicks, causing injuries to his hand, thigh, and chest. The deceased lodged a complaint on 19.08.1999, but later on 24.08.1999, he was admitted to the hospital for a head injury (haemorrhage in the right frontal region extra dural space). He died on 29.08.1999, and the complaint was converted into an FIR under Section 302 r/w Section 34 IPC on 30.08.1999. After trial, the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, acquitted the accused on 06.02.2003, holding that the cause of death could not be co-related to the alleged assault. The State appealed. The High Court considered submissions from the learned APP and the defense counsel. Upon perusing the appeal paper book and original record, the court found no reason to interfere with the Trial Court's finding. The court noted that the deceased had a separate head injury that led to his death, and the prosecution failed to establish that this injury was inflicted during the alleged assault. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the acquittal was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Acquittal Appeal - Causal Link - Section 302 r/w Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The State appealed against acquittal of accused charged with murder. The deceased was assaulted on 18.08.1999, but died on 29.08.1999 due to a head injury (haemorrhage in right frontal region extra dural space). The Trial Court held that the cause of death could not be co-related to the alleged assault. The High Court, on reappreciation of evidence, found no error in the Trial Court's view and dismissed the appeal. Held that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary causal link between the assault and the death (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquittal of the respondents/accused for the offence of murder under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was justified, given the alleged assault and subsequent death of the deceased.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The acquittal of the respondents/accused is upheld.

Law Points

  • Criminal Law
  • Murder
  • Acquittal Appeal
  • Causal Link
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • Indian Penal Code
  • 1860
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (01) 6

Criminal Appeal No.390 of 2003

2021-01-05

Ravindra V. Ghuge, B. U. Debadwar

K.S. Patil (APP for Appellant), S.S. Rathi (Advocate for Respondents)

The State of Maharashtra

Rameshwar s/o Kanhoba Chalak and Ramesh s/o Kishanrao Chalak

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal in a murder case

Remedy Sought

The State sought reversal of the acquittal of the respondents/accused for the offence of murder under Section 302 r/w Section 34 IPC.

Filing Reason

The State challenged the acquittal on the ground that the Trial Court erred in holding that the cause of death could not be co-related to the alleged assault.

Previous Decisions

The Trial Court (2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani) acquitted the accused on 06.02.2003 in Sessions Case No.186/1999.

Issues

Whether the prosecution established a causal link between the alleged assault on 18.08.1999 and the death of Munja Vishwanath More on 29.08.1999.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned APP argued that the Trial Court erred in acquitting the accused and that the evidence on record established the guilt. The learned advocate for the respondents supported the acquittal, submitting that the cause of death was not connected to the alleged assault.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to establish the necessary causal link between the alleged assault and the death of the deceased. The head injury that caused death could not be co-related to the incident of 18.08.1999.

Judgment Excerpts

After a full fledged trial, it was held that the cause of death of Munja could not be co-related to the incident of alleged assault on 18.08.1999 and hence, both the accused were acquitted. On due circumspection, for the view that we intend to take, we do not find any reason to enlarge this judgment by reproducing each and every deposition from the record and proceedings.

Procedural History

The respondents/accused were tried in Sessions Case No.186/1999 before the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for murder under Section 302 r/w Section 34 IPC. The Trial Court acquitted them on 06.02.2003. The State appealed to the High Court, which dismissed the appeal on 05.01.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Quash Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage. Allegations of Sexual Assault Over 15 Years Under Threat of Viral Video and Extortion Not Fit for Quashing at Initial Stage.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Holds Deposit Under Debtor-Creditor Law Not Valid Rent Tender, Allowing Landlord's Eviction Petition. Deposit Under East Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934 Section 31 Does Not Constitute Tender Under East Punjab Urban Rent Restrict...