Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sandip Prakash Rathod, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Kavita, by setting her on fire. The prosecution alleged that on 17 September 2013, the appellant poured kerosene on Kavita and ignited her, leading to her death. The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment. The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad heard the appeal. The court examined the dying declarations made by the deceased, which were recorded by a police head constable and later by a Special Judicial Magistrate. The court found significant inconsistencies between the two dying declarations: in the first, the deceased stated that the appellant poured kerosene and set her on fire, while in the second, she stated that she caught fire accidentally while cooking. The medical evidence also indicated that the burns were consistent with accidental fire. The court held that the dying declarations were unreliable and lacked corroboration. The court also noted that the other accused were acquitted, and there was no independent witness to support the prosecution's case. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the appellant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Corroboration - Inconsistency - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - The court considered the admissibility and reliability of dying declarations where multiple declarations exist with contradictions. Held that when there are inconsistencies between dying declarations, the court must scrutinize them carefully and seek corroboration. In this case, the dying declarations were contradictory regarding the role of the appellant, and the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's version. The conviction was set aside (Paras 1-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable based on the dying declarations and other evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of all charges.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Corroboration
  • Inconsistency
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (12) 31

Criminal Appeal No.286 of 2015

2022-12-20

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Rajesh S. Patil

Mr. Joydeep Chatterji for Appellant, Mr. S.J. Salgare, A.P.P. for Respondent-State

Sandip Prakash Rathod

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction and life sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife based on dying declarations.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment on 2nd March 2015.

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and consistent? Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence. Respondent argued that the dying declaration was voluntary and truthful.

Ratio Decidendi

When dying declarations are inconsistent and lack corroboration, they cannot form the sole basis for conviction. The court must scrutinize such evidence carefully.

Judgment Excerpts

Appellant is the husband of deceased Kavita, who stood prosecuted and convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution story, in short, is that Kavita who was aged 27 years, got married about 9 years prior to her death with accused No.1 i.e. present appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna on 2nd March 2015 in Sessions Case No.24 of 2014. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498-A, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Refers Conflict Between High Courts on Settlement Commission Jurisdiction Under Customs Act — Personal Liberty and Right to Settle Disputes Under Chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the matter to be placed before the...