Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Claim. Perverse Finding on Tampering Set Aside as Based on No Evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Surendra Murlidhar Kopulwar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 6-7-2021 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, which invalidated his claim of belonging to the 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner had claimed that he belongs to the 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe. The Scrutiny Committee found that pre-constitutional documents from the paternal side showed different statuses such as 'Telangi', 'Manewar', 'Telgu', and 'Telgu Manwar', and that in two documents the word 'Telgu' was scored out, allegedly by deliberate interference by relatives. The High Court, per Sunil B. Shukre and Anil L. Pansare, JJ., held that there was no material on record to support the conclusion that the petitioner or his relatives were responsible for the scoring out, and that the remark was based on no evidence and was perverse. The Court also noted that the entries were not confusing but showed a consistent pattern of 'Mannewar'. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the Scrutiny Committee to reconsider the matter afresh, giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Validity of Scrutiny Committee Order - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's claim of belonging to 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe based on confusing entries in pre-constitutional documents and alleged deliberate interference by relatives - The High Court found that the finding of deliberate interference was based on no evidence and was perverse, and that the entries were not confusing but showed a consistent pattern of 'Mannewar' - Held that the order was unsustainable and set aside (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's claim of belonging to 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 6-7-2021 passed by the Scrutiny Committee is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration, giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Perverse finding
  • no evidence
  • pre-constitutional documents
  • Scheduled Tribe claim
  • Mannewar
  • Telangi
  • Telgu
  • Scrutiny Committee
  • Writ Petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (10) 99

Writ Petition No.360 of 2022

2022-10-19

Sunil B. Shukre, Anil L. Pansare

Shri S.S. Joshi for Petitioner, Ms N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2

Surendra Murlidhar Kopulwar

The State of Maharashtra, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, Amravati, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's claim of belonging to 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 6-7-2021 and direction to issue a validity certificate.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe claim based on alleged confusing entries and deliberate interference with documents.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee passed the impugned order on 6-7-2021.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's finding of deliberate interference by the petitioner or his relatives with pre-constitutional documents is based on evidence. Whether the entries in pre-constitutional documents are confusing so as to invalidate the Scheduled Tribe claim.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the finding of deliberate interference was perverse and based on no evidence. Respondents supported the Scrutiny Committee's order.

Ratio Decidendi

A finding of deliberate tampering with documents must be based on evidence; a perverse finding based on no evidence cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The remark passed in this regard by the Scrutiny Committee is based upon no evidence and is perverse. This finding, therefore, deserves to be set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the order dated 6-7-2021 of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, which invalidated his claim of belonging to the 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Discharge of Airman for Habitual Indiscipline. Second Warning Not Mandatory Under Habitual Offenders Policy When Competent Authority Decides to Discharge Without Givi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakar Tribe Claim — Non-Compliance with Supreme Court Remand Directions. Committee Failed to Consider All Documents as Directed, Rendering Impugned Order Unsustainable and Matter Rema...