Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Invalidity of Thakur Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Student. Pre-Constitution Documents and Uncle's Validity Certificate Must Be Considered Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kum. Akanksha Babasaheb Shinde, a student, challenged an order dated 8 December 2020 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division, which invalidated her caste certificate certifying her as belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner claimed she was born into the Thakur Scheduled Tribe and had been issued a caste certificate by the Competent Authority on 4 August 2019. She applied to the Scrutiny Committee on 23 September 2019 for verification of her caste certificate, which was required for her to pursue studies under the reserved category. In support of her claim, she submitted several documents, including two pre-constitution period documents and a caste validity certificate issued to her real uncle, Sachin Nana Shinde. The petitioner participated in the hearing but the Committee rejected her tribe claim without considering these crucial documents. The court found that the Committee had failed to consider the pre-constitution documents and the validity certificate of the real uncle, which are relevant under the Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. The court held that the impugned order was unsustainable and quashed it, directing the Committee to reconsider the matter afresh, taking into account all the documents submitted by the petitioner, and to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Certificate Verification - Consideration of Pre-Constitution Documents - Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's Thakur Scheduled Tribe certificate despite the petitioner submitting two pre-constitution period documents and a caste validity certificate issued to her real uncle, Sachin Nana Shinde. The court held that the Committee failed to consider these crucial pieces of evidence, which are relevant under the Rules. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. (Paras 4-8)

B) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Certificate Verification - Validity Certificate of Blood Relative - Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - The petitioner relied on a caste validity certificate issued to her real uncle, which is a relevant document under the Rules. The Committee's failure to consider this document was held to be a serious error. The court directed the Committee to consider all documents, including the pre-constitution documents and the uncle's validity certificate, and pass a fresh order within eight weeks. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the petitioner's Thakur Scheduled Tribe certificate without properly considering the pre-constitution period documents and the caste validity certificate issued to the petitioner's real uncle.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 8 December 2020 passed by Respondent No.2 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to Respondent No.2 for fresh consideration. Respondent No.2 shall consider all the documents submitted by the petitioner, including the pre-constitution period documents and the caste validity certificate of her real uncle, and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Caste certificate verification
  • Scheduled Tribe claim
  • pre-constitution documents
  • validity certificate of blood relative
  • consideration of evidence
  • Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules
  • 2003
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (04) 91

WRIT PETITION NO. 1012 OF 2021

2022-04-04

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, G.A. SANAP

Mr.R.K. Mendadkar a/w. Ms. Komal Gaikwad for the Petitioner, Mr. Sameer Khedekar for Respondent No.3, Mrs. P. N.Diwan, AGP for State, Mr. Sandeep Waghmare for Respondent No.4

Kum. Akanksha Babasaheb Shinde

State of Maharashtra, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division, Commissioner and Competent Authority, State CET Cell, Cumming Engineering College for Women, Pune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 8 December 2020 passed by Respondent No.2 and a direction to verify her caste certificate as belonging to Thakur Scheduled Tribe.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's Thakur Scheduled Tribe certificate without considering pre-constitution documents and the caste validity certificate of her real uncle.

Previous Decisions

The Competent Authority issued a caste certificate of Thakur Scheduled Tribe to the petitioner on 4 August 2019. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated it on 8 December 2020.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee erred in not considering the pre-constitution period documents submitted by the petitioner. Whether the Scrutiny Committee erred in not considering the caste validity certificate issued to the petitioner's real uncle, Sachin Nana Shinde.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner submitted that she belongs to Thakur Scheduled Tribe by birth and submitted two pre-constitution period documents and a caste validity certificate of her real uncle. The petitioner argued that the Scrutiny Committee rejected her claim without considering these crucial documents.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents, including pre-constitution period documents and caste validity certificates of blood relatives, while verifying a Scheduled Tribe claim. Failure to do so renders the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

According to Petitioner, without considering the pre-constitution period documents and validity certificate Respondent No.2 rejected her tribe claim. In our view, the impugned order is unsustainable. The Respondent No.2 has failed to consider the pre-constitution period documents and the validity certificate of the real uncle of the petitioner.

Procedural History

The Competent Authority issued a caste certificate to the petitioner on 4 August 2019. The petitioner applied to the Scrutiny Committee on 23 September 2019 for verification. The Scrutiny Committee passed the impugned order on 8 December 2020 invalidating the certificate. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax Paid by Non-Resident Despite Revenue's Appeal — Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable. Service Tax Refund Ordered as Stay Application Dismissed and Tax Paid by Appellant Itself, Not Collected from Others...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Invalidity of Thakur Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Student. Pre-Constitution Documents and Uncle's Validity Certificate Must Be Considered Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and ...