Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape and POCSO Case Based on Settlement and Undertaking to Marry. Court Considers Future of Parties and Accepts No-Objection from Victim and Parents.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Nauman Suleman Khan, was accused in FIR No. I-240 of 2015 registered at Vashi Police Station for offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act). The complaint was filed by the father of the victim girl, alleging sexual abuse and harassment of his minor daughter. The applicant was arrested, and a charge-sheet was filed, pending as POSCO Special Act No. 198 of 2015 before the Special Court at Thane. During the pendency of the prosecution, through intervention and well-wishers, the applicant settled the dispute with the victim, who had by then become major. Both parties were present in court. The victim filed an affidavit stating that she and the applicant were in love and had decided to marry after settling in their respective careers. Her parents also filed affidavits explaining that the FIR was lodged due to a misunderstanding and accepted the friendship between their daughter and the applicant. The victim attempted to explain that her earlier statements to the police and magistrate were given under tutoring, but the court did not accept that explanation. The court, however, was inclined to accept the prayer for quashing considering the parties' agreement to marry. The court accepted the victim's readiness as an undertaking and also asked the applicant about his readiness to marry, which he gave as an undertaking to the court. The court quashed the FIR and proceedings, only by considering their future, noting that if the prosecution continued, it would affect their future.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Settlement between parties - Section 376 IPC, Section 4 POCSO Act - The Court quashed the FIR and proceedings on the basis of settlement between the accused and the victim, who had become major, and their mutual undertaking to marry, considering their future and the no-objection from the victim and her parents (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and proceedings under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act can be quashed on the basis of settlement between the accused and the victim, who has now become major, and their mutual agreement to marry.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application and quashed FIR No. I-240 of 2015 and the pending POSCO Special Act No. 198 of 2015, considering the settlement, the victim's no-objection, and the mutual undertaking to marry.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Settlement between parties
  • Undertaking to marry
  • POCSO Act
  • Section 376 IPC
  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (04) 71

Criminal Application No. 636 of 2017

2022-04-29

Prasanna B. Varale, S.M. Modak

Datta Mane, K.V. Saste, Hrishikesh P. Hartalkar

Nauman Suleman Khan

State of Maharashtra, Tanvi Amardas Bhalla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR and proceedings under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought quashing of FIR No. I-240 of 2015 and the pending POSCO Special Act No. 198 of 2015.

Filing Reason

The applicant was accused of sexual abuse and harassment of a minor girl, and the parties later settled the dispute with the victim becoming major and agreeing to marry.

Previous Decisions

The FIR was registered, the applicant was arrested, and charge-sheet was filed; the case was pending before the Special Court at Thane.

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act can be quashed on the basis of settlement and undertaking to marry.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant and the victim have settled the dispute and have agreed to marry. The victim and her parents have filed affidavits stating no objection to quashing. The victim is now major and has given an undertaking to marry the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court can quash FIR and proceedings in non-compoundable offences like Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act if the parties have settled the dispute, the victim has become major, and they have agreed to marry, considering the future of the parties.

Judgment Excerpts

We are inclined to accept the prayer for quashing for the reasons that both have agreed to marry. We accept her readiness as an undertaking given today to this Court. So we are inclined to accept the request for quashing the FIR, only by considering their future.

Procedural History

FIR No. I-240 of 2015 was registered at Vashi Police Station under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act. The applicant was arrested and charge-sheet was filed, pending as POSCO Special Act No. 198 of 2015 before the Special Court at Thane. During pendency, the parties settled the dispute. The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 636 of 2017 for quashing. The court heard the matter and passed judgment on 29 April 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Damages. Court fees are not payable on a tentative claim at the initial stage when the exact valuation is to be adjudicated later, as per Section 7(i)...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Restores 100% Functional Disability for Loss of Earning Capacity Due to Amputation. Amputation of right lower limb renders gunman permanently unfit for duty, warranting full c...