Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for throttling deceased set aside as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and circumstantial evidence insufficient.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Appellant, Sameer Khan, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag for the murder of Devi Deepak Sarkar @ Deepti Sameer Khan under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that the Appellant and deceased were in a love affair, and on 04/10/2012, after a quarrel, the Appellant throttled the deceased to death in her room. Neighbors heard noise and saw the Appellant jumping out of the window. The landlord lodged an FIR. During trial, the prosecution examined several witnesses, but key witnesses including the landlord and neighbors turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case. The medical evidence confirmed death by throttling, but there was no direct evidence linking the Appellant to the crime. The trial court convicted based on circumstantial evidence. On appeal, the High Court found that the chain of circumstances was incomplete, as the hostile witnesses could not be relied upon, and there was no other credible evidence. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and accordingly allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and acquitting the Appellant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires complete chain of circumstances pointing only to guilt of accused - In this case, prosecution witnesses turned hostile, no eyewitness, and circumstantial evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Held that conviction cannot be sustained and accused is entitled to acquittal (Paras 1-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the Appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Devi Deepak Sarkar @ Deepti Sameer Khan is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The judgment and order dated 27/11/2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag in Sessions Case No.20 of 2013 is set aside. The Appellant is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The Appellant be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • hostile witness
  • benefit of doubt
  • murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • conviction set aside
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (03) 64

Criminal Appeal No.344 of 2015

2022-03-17

S. S. Shinde, Sarang V. Kotwal

2022:BHC-AS:6148-DB

Mr. Aniket Vagal, Mr. S. S. Hulke

Sameer Khan Alias Wasim Azgar Nehal Azgar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by challenging the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Sessions Judge

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of Devi Deepak Sarkar @ Deepti Sameer Khan

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag convicted the Appellant on 27/11/2014 in Sessions Case No.20 of 2013

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecution witnesses turned hostile and there was no credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt State argued that the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and must point only to the guilt of the accused. When key prosecution witnesses turn hostile and there is no other reliable evidence, the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused is entitled to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant has challenged the Judgment and Order dated 27/11/2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raigad, at Alibag in Sessions Case No.20 of 2013. The Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-.

Procedural History

The Appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag on 27/11/2014 in Sessions Case No.20 of 2013 for murder under Section 302 IPC. The Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.344 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court challenging the conviction. The appeal was heard and decided on 17/03/2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Compliance with Bail Guidelines and Judicial Reforms in Monitoring Proceeding. The Court issued specific directions to States, Union Territories, CBI, and High Courts for implementing bail guidelines under Sections 41 and 41-A o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Fatal Stabbing Incident. The court held that the appellant's act of stabbing the deceased during a sudden quarrel without intention to cause death but ...