Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Non-Registration of FIR Does Not Bar Negligence Finding. Claimant's Complaint and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Accident and Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which had fixed liability on the insurer for compensation arising from a motor accident. The appellant contended that since no FIR was registered in respect of the accident, the Tribunal should not have considered the negligence of the driver of the Maruti car. The respondent No.1/claimant, Lalbahadur Z. Gupta, claimed that on 02.05.2005 at around 8 p.m., while walking on the road, he was dashed by Motor Car No. MH-03-Z-1309, causing him to fall and sustain a fractured jaw and five broken teeth. The driver took him to the hospital. On 04.02.2005, he lodged a complaint at the police station, but the police only made a Station Diary Entry and closed the matter as a minor accident. The Tribunal, relying on the complaint and medical evidence, held that the accident was caused due to the negligence of the driver. The High Court heard both sides. The Court noted that under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is the police's duty to register an FIR for a cognizable offence. The claimant had informed the police, and the police's failure to register an FIR cannot be held against the claimant. Moreover, the driver of the offending car did not deny the incident, and the evidence of DW-2 Dr. Vinod Kumar Nair confirmed that five teeth were broken due to the accident, supporting the claimant's case. The Court found no merit in the appellant's submissions and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's order.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Negligence - Proof - Non-registration of FIR - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The issue was whether the Tribunal could fix liability on the insurer when no FIR was registered. The Court held that the claimant had lodged a complaint with the police, and the police's failure to register an FIR cannot be held against the claimant. The driver of the offending vehicle did not deny the incident, and medical evidence supported the claimant's case. Therefore, the Tribunal's finding of negligence was proper. (Paras 1-5)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Police Duty - Registration of FIR - Section 154 CrPC - The Court observed that under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is the duty of the police to register an FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence. If the police fail to do so, the blame cannot be placed on the complainant. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal could fix liability on the insurer despite no FIR being registered in respect of the accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai is upheld.

Law Points

  • Non-registration of FIR does not preclude finding of negligence in motor accident claims
  • Police duty to register FIR under Section 154 CrPC
  • Claimant cannot be blamed for police inaction
  • Medical evidence can support claim
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (12) 90

First Appeal No. 1016 of 2014

2023-12-18

Shivkumar Dige

2023:BHC-AS:39481

Mr. S.M. Dange for Appellant, Ms. Sushma S. Poyekar for Respondent No.1

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Lalbahadur Z. Gupta and T. Sunder Kumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal fixing liability on insurer for compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant insurance company sought to set aside the Tribunal's order on the ground that no FIR was registered.

Filing Reason

Appellant contended that without FIR, Tribunal could not have fixed negligence on the driver.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai passed judgment and order fixing liability on the appellant.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal could fix liability on the insurer despite no FIR being registered in respect of the accident.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that without FIR, the Tribunal should not have considered negligence of the driver. Respondent/claimant argued that claimant lodged complaint, police failed to register FIR, and medical evidence supported the claim.

Ratio Decidendi

Non-registration of FIR does not preclude a finding of negligence in motor accident claims. The claimant cannot be blamed for police inaction. Medical evidence and lack of denial by the driver can support the claim.

Judgment Excerpts

In my view, as per Section 154 of Code of Criminal Procedure, on complaint police register FIR in respect of cognizable offence. In the present case, the claimant had lodged the complaint with police station about the happened incident. Taking cognizance of the complaint was the duty of the police. If the police did not register offence, the blame cannot be put on the claimant, as claimant had informed the police about the happened accident. Moreover, driver of offending car has not denied about the happened incident. Police has not closed enquiry of the complaint stating that it was false complaint, it has been closed on the ground that, the accident was minor in nature.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai passed judgment and order fixing liability on the appellant insurer. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 1016 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 18th December 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 154
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Non-Registration of FIR Does Not Bar Negligence Finding. Claimant's Complaint and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Accident and Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Rejects Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act Due to Premature Invocation of Two-Tier Dispute Resolution Clause. The Applicant Failed to First Exhaust the Decision of the Five-Member Commit...