Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Kalyan to Pune on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Pending Proceedings at Pune. The court held that the wife's residence in Pune, her work, care for her mother, and pending FIR and domestic violence proceedings at Pune warranted transfer under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant wife filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of divorce proceedings filed by the respondent husband from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. The marriage was solemnized on 11 July 2019 in Chembur, Mumbai, and the couple initially resided in Dombivli before moving to Pune in August 2019 for professional work. In December 2021, the husband allegedly manhandled the wife and left for Dombivli, after which the wife moved to a separate residence in Dighi, Pune with her mother. The wife filed a non-cognizable police complaint in April 2021 and later an FIR under Section 498A IPC and a domestic violence proceeding, both in Pune. The husband filed a divorce petition in Kalyan on 20 January 2022. The wife argued that she is a software professional working in Pune, lives with her mother, and has to care for her mother, making it difficult to travel to Kalyan for court hearings. She also highlighted the pendency of related proceedings in Pune. The husband opposed the transfer, claiming the wife had previously resided in Dombivli and that the court at Kalyan had jurisdiction. The court, after considering the submissions and the mediation report indicating failed mediation, allowed the transfer, noting that the convenience of the wife, who is the applicant, and the pendency of other proceedings at Pune justified the transfer. The court directed that the divorce petition be transferred from Kalyan to Pune and that the transferee court may decide to club the proceedings if appropriate.

Headnote

A) Transfer of Divorce Petition - Convenience of Wife - Section 24 CPC - The wife sought transfer of divorce proceedings from Kalyan to Pune, citing her residence in Pune, pending FIR under Section 498A IPC and domestic violence proceedings at Pune, and difficulty in traveling due to work and care of her mother. The court allowed the transfer, holding that the convenience of the wife and the pendency of related proceedings at Pune warranted the transfer. (Paras 3-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition filed by the husband at Kalyan should be transferred to Pune for the convenience of the wife, who resides in Pune and has other proceedings pending there.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The divorce petition (P.A. No. 87 of 2022) pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan is withdrawn and transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. The transferee court may decide to club the proceedings if appropriate. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of divorce petition
  • convenience of wife
  • pending proceedings at transferee court
  • Section 24 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 99

Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 227 of 2022

2023-10-06

Abhay Ahuja, J.

2023:BHC-AS:29780

Mr. Harshad Rathod for the Applicant, Mr. Arjun Jeswani with Mr. Rajan S. Pawar for the Respondent

Smt. Priyanka Patro

Shri Arvind Rajasekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for transfer of divorce proceedings from Kalyan to Pune under Section 24 CPC.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of divorce petition filed by the husband at Kalyan to Pune for the wife's convenience.

Filing Reason

The wife resides in Pune, has pending FIR under Section 498A IPC and domestic violence proceedings in Pune, and faces difficulty in traveling to Kalyan due to work and care for her mother.

Previous Decisions

Mediation failed; mediation report dated 3 October 2023 taken on record.

Issues

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from Kalyan to Pune for the convenience of the wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant (wife): She is a software professional in Pune, lives with her mother, has pending FIR and domestic violence proceedings in Pune, and traveling to Kalyan is inconvenient. Respondent (husband): Opposed transfer, claiming the wife previously resided in Dombivli and the Kalyan court has jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The convenience of the wife, who is the applicant, and the pendency of related proceedings at the transferee court are relevant considerations for transfer under Section 24 CPC. The court allowed the transfer to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and for the wife's convenience.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application seeking transfer of divorce proceedings filed by the Applicant before the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune. The learned counsel submit that they are ready to proceed with the matter. The application is allowed.

Procedural History

The wife filed the transfer application in 2022. Mediation was attempted but failed. The matter was heard on 6 October 2023, and the court allowed the transfer.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Kalyan to Pune on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Pending Proceedings at Pune. The court held that the wife's residence in Pune, her work, care for her mother, and pending FIR and domestic ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Independent Enquiry — Mere Borrowing of Reasons from Investigation Report Without Application of Mind Invalidates Reassessment. The Court held that the Asses...