Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in IPC Rape and Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Delay in FIR and Attending Circumstances. Anticipatory Bail Granted Under Section 438 CrPC as Incident Occurred Five Months Before FIR Lodging, With Conditions Including Cash Security and Cooperation With Investigation.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from the rejection of an anticipatory bail application by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellant, apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.0076 dated 10.03.2022 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sheopur for offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, had sought anticipatory bail before the High Court. The High Court rejected the application, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court. The core legal issue was whether the appellant was entitled to anticipatory bail considering the allegations and circumstances of the case. The appellant's counsel argued for bail while the State's counsel opposed it. The Supreme Court analyzed the allegations in the First Information Report, noting that the incident in question had occurred five months before the FIR was lodged. Considering this delay and the attending circumstances, the court found that a case for anticipatory bail was made out. The court made absolute its earlier interim order granting protection from arrest and directed that if arrested, the appellant be released on bail upon furnishing cash security of Rs.50,000 with two sureties. The bail was expressly granted subject to the appellant rendering complete cooperation in the investigation, presenting himself when requisitioned by the investigating officer, and not hampering the investigation or trial. The appeal was allowed with these observations and conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Grant of Bail - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 438 - Appellant apprehended arrest for offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC - High Court rejected anticipatory bail application - Supreme Court considered allegations that incident occurred five months before FIR was lodged and attending circumstances - Held that case for anticipatory bail was made out and granted bail with conditions including cash security and cooperation with investigation (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail for offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Interim order dated 14.07.2022 made absolute. Appellant granted anticipatory bail with conditions: (a) if arrested, to be released on bail on furnishing cash security of Rs.50,000 with two sureties, subject to complete cooperation in investigation; (b) to present himself when requisitioned by investigating officer; (c) not to hamper investigation or trial.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail principles
  • consideration of delay in lodging FIR
  • attending circumstances
  • conditions for bail
  • cooperation with investigation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (9) 80

Criminal Appeal No.1446 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5869 of 2022)

2022-09-05

Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat

Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Mr. Gopal Jha

Beerbal Prasad Rajoriya

State of Madhya Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against rejection of anticipatory bail application

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeking anticipatory bail for offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC

Filing Reason

Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.0076 dated 10.03.2022

Previous Decisions

High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior rejected anticipatory bail application in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.23648 of 2022 on 14.06.2022

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail for offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC

Ratio Decidendi

Anticipatory bail can be granted when there is delay in lodging FIR and attending circumstances justify such relief, with appropriate conditions to ensure cooperation with investigation.

Judgment Excerpts

Going by the allegations made in the First Information Report that the incident in question had occurred five months before the First Information Report was lodged and the attending circumstances, in our view, the case of anticipatory bail is made out. Pending further consideration, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with First Information Report No.0076 dated 10.03.2022 registered with Police Station Kotwali Sheopur, District Sheopur, Madhya Pradesh, in respect of the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Procedural History

FIR No.0076 dated 10.03.2022 registered for offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC → Appellant filed anticipatory bail application before High Court → High Court rejected application on 14.06.2022 → Appellant filed SLP before Supreme Court → Supreme Court granted interim relief on 14.07.2022 → Final hearing and judgment on 05.09.2022

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376(2)(n), 506
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in IPC Rape and Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Delay in FIR and Attending Circumstances. Anticipatory Bail Granted Under Section 438 CrPC as Incident Occurred Five Months Before FIR Lodging, With C...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Degree Holders in Junior Engineer Recruitment Dispute - Upholds High Court's View that Degree is Not Higher Qualification than Diploma Under Recruitment Rules. The Court held that a degree in Electrical Engineering ...