Bombay High Court Allows B.Ed. Colleges to Participate in Centralized Admission Process Despite Lack of Regular Principal and Faculty Appointments — University Directed to Issue No Objection Certificate. The court held that the University cannot impose additional conditions beyond NCTE regulations and that the colleges' inability to appoint regular staff due to the one-year course duration and financial constraints should not bar them from participating in CAP.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 68
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Marathwada Shikshan Prasarak Mandal's Jayprakash Narayan B.Ed. College and Jaimalhar Sevabhavi Sanstha's Keshavraj B.Ed. College, are unaided teacher education institutions recognized by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) with an intake of 50 students per division. They have two divisions and the B.Ed. course duration was reduced from two years to one year. The colleges sought a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University to participate in the Centralized Admission Process (CAP) for the academic year 2023-24. The University refused to issue the NOC on the ground that the colleges had not appointed a regular Principal and regular faculties. The petitioners argued that due to the one-year course and financial constraints, they could not appoint regular staff and were managing with contractual or visiting faculty. They contended that the University's condition was arbitrary and beyond NCTE regulations. The court analyzed the relevant provisions and found that the University's insistence on regular appointments was not supported by any statutory rule or regulation. The court noted that the NCTE had granted recognition and that the colleges had been functioning for years. The court held that the University cannot impose additional conditions that hinder the colleges' right to admit students. The court directed the University to issue the NOC and allow the petitioners to participate in CAP for 2023-24, subject to compliance with other requirements. The judgment was pronounced on 21 September 2023.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Teacher Education - No Objection Certificate - University Affiliation - The petitioners, unaided B.Ed. colleges recognized by NCTE, challenged the University's refusal to issue NOC for CAP 2023-24 due to lack of regular Principal and faculty appointments. The court held that the University cannot impose additional conditions beyond NCTE regulations and that the colleges' inability to appoint regular staff due to the one-year course duration and financial constraints should not bar them from participating in CAP. The court directed the University to issue NOC and allow participation (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the University can refuse to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to B.Ed. colleges for participating in the Centralized Admission Process (CAP) solely on the ground that the colleges have not appointed a regular Principal and regular faculties, despite having NCTE recognition and fulfilling other requirements.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions, directing the University to issue No Objection Certificate to the petitioners and permit them to participate in the Centralized Admission Process for the academic year 2023-24, subject to compliance with other requirements.

Law Points

  • Educational Institutions
  • Teacher Education
  • No Objection Certificate
  • Regular Appointment
  • Centralized Admission Process
  • NCTE Recognition
  • University Affiliation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 12

Writ Petition No. 7474 of 2023 with Writ Petition No. 10510 of 2023

2023-09-21

Mangesh S. Patil, Shailesh P. Brahme

2023:BHC-AUG:20584-DB

Mr. N.B. Khandare for petitioner; Mr. S.S. Tope for Respondent No.1 in WP 7474/2023; Mr. Sachin Kupetkar for Respondent No.2 in WP 7474/2023; Mr. S.S. Thombre for Respondent No.1 in WP 10510/2023; Mr. M.D. Narwadkar for Respondent No.2 in WP 10510/2023

Marathwada Shikshan Prasarak Mandal’s Jayprakash Narayan B.Ed. College, Through Principal; Jaimalhar Sevabhavi Sanstha’s Keshavraj B.Ed. College, Through Principal

The Registrar, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad; Commissioner & Competent Authority, State Common Entrance Test Cell, Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging University's refusal to issue No Objection Certificate for participation in Centralized Admission Process.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the University to issue No Objection Certificate and allow participation in CAP for academic year 2023-24.

Filing Reason

University refused NOC on ground of non-appointment of regular Principal and faculties.

Issues

Whether the University can refuse NOC for CAP solely on ground of non-appointment of regular Principal and faculties. Whether the condition of regular appointment is beyond NCTE regulations and arbitrary.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that due to one-year course and financial constraints, they cannot appoint regular staff; they manage with contractual/visiting faculty; University's condition is arbitrary and not supported by any rule. Respondents argued that regular appointment is necessary for quality education and compliance with University norms.

Ratio Decidendi

The University cannot impose additional conditions beyond NCTE regulations for issuing NOC; the inability to appoint regular staff due to course duration and financial constraints is not a valid ground to deny participation in CAP.

Judgment Excerpts

Both the petitioners are challenging action of the respondent /University refusing to issue no objection certificate for want of appointment of regular Principal and the faculties. The court held that the University cannot impose additional conditions beyond NCTE regulations and that the colleges' inability to appoint regular staff due to the one-year course duration and financial constraints should not bar them from participating in CAP.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the University's refusal to issue NOC. The court reserved judgment on 15 September 2023 and pronounced on 21 September 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Accused Persons in Multi-State Investment Fraud FIRs Clubbing and Grants Interim Bail. Clubbing Permitted Only Within Telangana and Maharashtra, While Single FIRs in Other States Not Transferred; Future FIR Clubbing Prayer...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act...